Bassam Zawadi has a real difficult time admitting(1) that his prophet was uncertain
of his calling and was therefore commanded to consult the previous Scriptures to assuage his
lingering doubts:
Christian missionaries point to the two following verses from the Qur'an in order to
try and show that the Qur'an commands the Prophet peace be upon him and the doubting
believers to refer to the Christians and Jews for consultation...
Surah 10:94
And if thou (Muhammad) art in doubt concerning that which We reveal unto thee, then
question those who read the Scripture (that was) before thee. Verily the Truth from thy
Lord hath come unto thee. So be not thou of the waverers.
Surah 16:43
And We sent not (as Our messengers) before thee other than men whom We inspired
- Ask the followers of the Remembrance if ye know not!
However, if that was indeed what these verses were saying then they would be
conflicting with the following verses in the Qur'an that indicate that the Prophet peace
be upon him and the believers have believed (not doubted) in what has been revealed to them...
(Source)
Zawadi goes on to source Q. 2:285, 7:158, 42:15 and 49:15 to show that Muhammad and his
followers believed, and did not doubt, what Allah revealed to them. He further references
two narratives which state that Muhammad claimed that he didn’t doubt that he
was Allah’s messenger.
Before we proceed with our rebuttal it is crucial that we first quote the immediate
context of Q. 10:94:
And if thou (Muhammad) art in doubt concerning that which We reveal unto thee,
then question those who read the Scripture (that was) before thee. Verily the Truth from
thy Lord hath come unto thee. So be not thou of the waverers. And be not thou of
those who deny the revelations of Allah, for then wert thou of the losers.
S. 10:94-95 Pickthall
With this in the background we can move into our discussion.
In the first place, the above verses establish several vitally important points. The
first is that Muhammad was expressly told to consult the previous Scriptures if he wanted
to know whether revelations were coming to him or whether God sent human apostles before
him. As the late renowned Christian scholar and Islamist Sir William Muir stated:
"The Book revealed before Mahomet," is explained by
Jelalooddeen to mean the Pentateuch; but there seems no reason to confine
the reference to it. Here, as in many other passages, the word is
obviously used in its widest sense, and intends the Scriptures in use
among Christians as well as Jews.
The object of God, in referring Mahomet to that Scripture and its
possessors, in order to be satisfied of the inspiration of the Corân, is
explained by Baidhâwi thus: "for verily it (i.e. the Corân
which We have revealed unto thee) is held as certain amongst them,
proved in their books, in the same manner as that which We have revealed
to thee. The object is to prove this, and to call in the testimony of the
antecedent books."
فانه محقق عندهم
ثابت في كتبهم
على نحو ما القينا
اليك والمراد
تحقيق ذالك
والإستشهاد بما
في الكتب المتقدمة
"Ask those who read the book revealed before thee."
Read, or "are reading," the Scripture. It is the present or
imperfect tense, and has the signification of, "who are in the habit
of reading" that Scripture. (Muir, The Corân: Its Composition and Teaching;
And the Testimony It Bears To The Holy Scriptures, pp. 100-101;
online edition)
This shows that the Holy Bible, which is the Scripture that was in the hands of the
people before Muhammad, functions as the criterion to determine whether the Quran is true
or not.
Second, the passages plainly and emphatically bear witness to the fact that Muhammad
had severe doubts whether he was actually receiving genuine revelations. What makes this
rather ironic is that Zawadi himself admits that Q. 10:94 refers to Muhammad:
The verse is addressing the Prophet Muhammad.
When you read the Arabic it says...
Fa-in kunta fee shakkin mimma
anzalnna ilayka fais-ali allatheena yaqraoona alkitaba min qablika laqad jaaka alhaqqu min
rabbika fala takoonanna mina almumtareena
The word kuntais singular. Therefore,
addressing one person. That being Prophet Muhammad. If it saidkuntumthen
it would be a general command for everyone.
God asked the Prophet if he had doubts and then Prophet replied back saying no.
God did not accuse the Prophet of having doubts. (Rebuttal to
"Muhammad and Poetry Revisited Again and Again";
source)
Thus, even though he is trying so desperately to deny the obvious, his admission here
that the ayah does refer to Muhammad basically confirms the fact that his prophet
did indeed have doubts and was severely rebuked because of it.
This leads us to our third point. Zawadi erroneously assumes that just because there
are verses and narratives that say Muhammad didn’t doubt this therefore somehow
proves or explains away those particular texts which clearly say that he did have doubts.
All Zawadi is proving at this point is that the Muslim scripture and Islamic source
material are filled with contradictions, something that we have known for quite awhile
(*). More on these contradictions a little later.
Fourth, the hadith literature provides examples of Muhammad actually asking the Jews
and Christians for verification of his prophethood.
This is a description of the Prophet Muhammad in the Books of the Prophets. They
delivered the good news of his advent to their nations and commanded them to follow him.
His descriptions were still apparent in their Books, as the rabbis and priests well know.
Imam Ahmad recorded that Abu Sakhr Al-'Uqayli said that a bedouin man said to him, "I
brought a milk-producing camel to Al-Madinah during the life time of Allah's Messenger.
After I sold it, I said to myself, 'I will meet that man (Muhammad) and hear from him.' So
I passed by him while he was walking between Abu Bakr and 'Umar, and I followed them until
they went by a Jewish man, who was reading from an open of the Tawrah. He was
mourning a son of his who was dying and who was one of the most handsome boys. The
Messenger of Allah asked him (the father), <I ask you by He Who has sent down the
Tawrah, do you not find the description of me and my advent in your Book?>
He nodded his head in the negative. His son said, 'Rather, yes, by He Who has sent down
the Tawrah! We find the description of you and your advent in our Book. I bear witness
that there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah and that you are the Messenger of
Allah.' The Prophet said (to the Companions),
<Stop the Jew (the father) from (taking care of) your brother (in Islam).>
The Prophet then personally took care of the son's funeral and led the funeral prayer on
him. This Hadith is sound and is supported by a similar Hadith in the Sahih
narrated from Anas.
Ibn Jarir recorded that Al-Muthanna said that 'Ata bin Yasar said, 'I met 'Abdullah bin
'Amr and asked him, 'Tell me about the description of Allah's Messenger in the Tawrah.' He
said, 'Yes, by Allah! He is described in the Tawrah, just as he is described in the
Qur'an,
<O Prophet! Verily, We have sent you as a witness, and a bearer of glad tidings, and
a warner.> [33:45]
as a safe refuge for the unlettered ones. [author's note- what follows is a paraphrase of
Isaiah 42:1-7] 'You are My servant and Messenger. I have called you 'Al-Mutawakkil'
(who trusts in Allah), not hard or harsh.' Neither uttering foul speech in the markets nor
returning evil deed with one in kind. Rather, he forgives and forgoes. Allah will not end
his life until He straightens through him the crooked religion, so that they might
proclaim, 'There is no deity worthy of worship except Allah.' He will open through him
sealed hearts, deaf ears and blind eyes.'" 'Ata then said, 'I also met Ka'b and asked
him the same question, and his answer did not differ from 'Abdullah's answer, even
concerning one letter." Al-Bukhari recorded from 'Abdullah bin 'Amr. It was also
recorded by Al-Bukhari [up to the word] forgoes. And he mentioned the narration of
'Abdullah bin 'Amr then he said: "It was common in the speech of our Salaf that they
describe the Books of the People of the Scriptures as the Tawrah, as some Hadiths
concur. Allah knows best." (Tafsir Ibn Kathir - Volume 4 (Surat Al-Ar'af to the
end of Surah Yunus), abridged by a group of scholars under the supervision of Shaykh
Safiur-Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri [Darussalam Publishers & Distributors, Riyadh, Houston,
New York, Lahore; First Edition: May 2000], pp. 178-179;
source;
bold emphasis ours)
Anyone reading this narrative without the prior assumption that Muhammad was a prophet
whom God spoke to can see that he wasn’t simply asking in order to help the Jew
recognize that he was a prophet. Rather, Muhammad asked since he wanted to personally know
whether what this Jew held in his possession could be used to verify his prophetic
mission. There are other hadiths which solidify this point, narrations which show that
Muhammad asked Jews and Christians regarding the teachings of the Holy Bible since he was
ignorant about what these Scriptures taught in their original languages:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The people of the Scripture (Jews) used to recite the Torah in Hebrew and they used
to explain it in Arabic to the Muslims. On that Allah's Apostle said, "Do not
believe the people of the Scripture or disbelieve them, but say:-- We believe in Allah and
what is revealed to us." (2:136) (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60,
Number 12)
Here Muhammad affirms his belief in the Scriptures which the Jews were reciting, much
like he did on another occasion:
Narrated Abdullah Ibn Umar:
A group of Jews came and invited the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) to Quff. So
he visited them in their school.
They said: AbulQasim, one of our men has committed fornication with a woman; so
pronounce judgment upon them. They placed a cushion for the Apostle of Allah
(peace_be_upon_him) who sat on it and said: Bring the Torah. It was then
brought. He then withdrew the cushion from beneath him and placed the Torah on it
saying: I believed in thee and in Him Who revealed thee.
He then said: Bring me one who is learned among you. Then a young man was brought. The
transmitter then mentioned the rest of the tradition of stoning similar to the one
transmitted by Malik from Nafi' (No. 4431)." (Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 38,
Number 4434)
To see a more thorough discussion of this specific narrative as well as a refutation
to Zawadi’s attempt of brushing aside this report please consult
this article.
This shows that Muhammad didn’t know what the Holy Scriptures taught since if he
did he would have known whether what the Jews were saying to him in Arabic agreed with the
contents of their inspired Scriptures.
The following reports further corroborate the fact that Muhammad asked because he
didn’t know what the Scriptures said and had doubts whether he was even mentioned:
Narrated Ibn ‘Umar:
A Jew and a Jewess were brought to Allah's Apostle on a charge of committing an illegal
sexual intercourse. The Prophet asked them. "What is the legal
punishment (for this sin) in your Book (Torah)?" They replied, "Our
priests have innovated the punishment of blackening the faces with charcoal and
Tajbiya." ‘Abdullah bin Salam said, "O Allah’s Apostle, tell them
to bring the Torah." The Torah was brought, and then one of the Jews put his hand
over the Divine Verse of the Rajam (stoning to death) and started reading what preceded
and what followed it. On that, Ibn Salam said to the Jew, "Lift up your hand."
Behold! The Divine Verse of the Rajam was under his hand. So Allah’s Apostle ordered
that the two (sinners) be stoned to death, and so they were stoned. Ibn ‘Umar added:
So both of them were stoned at the Balat and I saw the Jew sheltering the Jewess.
(Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 82,
Number 809)
Narrated Abdullah bin Umar:
The Jews came to Allah’s Apostle and mentioned to him that a man and a lady among
them had committed illegal sexual intercourse. Allah’s Apostle said to them, "What
do you find in the Torah regarding the Rajam?" They replied, "We only
disgrace and flog them with stripes." ‘Abdullah bin Salam said to them,
"You have told a lie the penalty of Rajam is in the Torah." They brought the
Torah and opened it. One of them put his hand over the verse of the Rajam and read what
was before and after it. Abdullah bin Salam said to him, "Lift up your
hand." Where he lifted it there appeared the verse of the Rajam. So they said,
"O Muhammad! He has said the truth, the verse of the Rajam is in it (Torah)."
Then Allah’s Apostle ordered that the two persons (guilty of illegal sexual
intercourse) be stoned to death, and so they were stoned, and I saw the man bending over
the woman so as to protect her from the stones. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 82,
Number 825)
Notice that Muhammad needed Abdullah ibn Salam to point out to him what the Torah
taught concerning the punishment of adulterers and adulteresses. All of this supports our
contention that Muhammad asked the Jew whether he was mentioned in the Hebrew Scriptures
because he himself wasn’t certain.
This wasn’t the only time that someone from among the People of the Book (i.e.,
Jews and Christians) had to reassure Muhammad that he was God’s prophet (even
though this in itself is an erroneous and mistaken position). It was a Christian monk
who (mistakenly) informed him that he was receiving messages from God. What makes this
all the more interesting is that Muhammad continued to have doubts to the point that
he contemplated committing suicide even though he had already been informed that he was
God’s apostle:
Narrated Aisha:
(the wife of the Prophet) The commencement (of the Divine Inspiration) to Allah's
Apostle was in the form of true dreams in his sleep, for he never had a dream but it
turned out to be true and clear as the bright daylight. Then he began to like seclusions,
so he used to go in seclusion in the cave of Hira where he used to worship Allah
continuously for many nights before going back to his family to take the necessary
provision (of food) for the stay. He come back to (his wife) Khadija again to take his
provision (of food) likewise, till one day he received the Guidance while he was in the
cave of Hira. An Angel came to him and asked him to read. Allah's Apostle replied, "I
do not know how to read." The Prophet added, "Then the Angel held me (forcibly)
and pressed me so hard that I felt distressed. Then he released me and again asked me to
read, and I replied, 'I do not know how to read.' Thereupon he held me again and pressed
me for the second time till I felt distressed. He then released me and asked me to read,
but again I replied. 'I do not know how to read.' Thereupon he held me for the third time
and pressed me till I got distressed, and then he released me and said, 'Read, in the Name
of your Lord Who has created (all that exists), has created man out of a clot, Read! And
your Lord is the Most Generous. Who has taught (the writing) by the pen, has taught man
that which he knew not." (96.1-5).
Then Allah's Apostle returned with that experience; and the muscles between his neck
and shoulders were trembling till he came upon Khadija (his wife) and said, "Cover
me!" They covered him, and when the state of fear was over, he said to Khadija,
"O Khadija! What is wrong with me? I was afraid that something bad might happen to
me." Then he told her the story. Khadija said, "Nay! But receive the good
tidings! By Allah, Allah will never disgrace you, for by Allah, you keep good relations
with your Kith and kin, speak the truth, help the poor and the destitute, entertain your
guests generously and assist those who are stricken with calamities." Khadija then
took him to Waraqa bin Naufil, the son of Khadija's paternal uncle. Waraqa had been
converted to Christianity in the Pre-lslamic Period and used to write Arabic and write of
the Gospel in Arabic as much as Allah wished him to write. He was an old man and
had lost his eyesight. Khadija said (to Waraqa), "O my cousin! Listen to what your
nephew is going to say." Waraqa said, "O my nephew! What have you seen?"
The Prophet then described whatever he had seen. Waraqa said, "This is the same Angel
(Gabriel) who was sent to Moses. I wish I were young." He added some other statement.
Allah's Apostle asked, "Will these people drive me out?" Waraqa said, "Yes,
for nobody brought the like of what you have brought, but was treated with hostility. If I
were to remain alive till your day (when you start preaching). then I would support you
strongly." But a short while later Waraqa died and the Divine Inspiration was paused
(stopped) for a while so that Allah's Apostle was very much grieved.
Narrated Jabir bin 'Abdullah: While Allah's Apostle was talking about the period
of pause in revelation. He said in his narration: Once while I was walking, all of
a sudden I heard a voice from the sky. I looked up and saw to my surprise, the same Angel
as had visited me in the cave of Hira. He was sitting on a chair between the sky and the
earth. I got afraid of him and came back home and said, "Wrap me! Wrap me!" So
they covered him and then Allah revealed:
‘O you, wrapped up! Arise and warn and your Lord magnify, and your garments purify
and dessert the idols.’ (74.1-5) (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60,
Number 478)
… But after a few days Waraqa died and the Divine Inspiration was also paused for
a while and the Prophet became so sad as we have heard that he intended SEVERAL
TIMES to throw himself from the tops of high mountains and every time he went up
the top of a mountain in order to throw himself down, Gabriel would appear before him and
say, "O Muhammad! You are indeed Allah's Apostle in truth" whereupon his heart
would become quiet and he would calm down and would return home. And whenever the
period of the coming of the inspiration USED TO BECOME LONG, HE WOULD DO AS BEFORE, but
when he used to reach the top of a mountain, Gabriel would appear before him and
say to him what he had said before. (Ibn 'Abbas said regarding the meaning of: ‘He it
is that Cleaves the daybreak (from the darkness)’ (6.96) that Al-Asbah means the light
of the sun during the day and the light of the moon at night). (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 87,
Number 111)
Noted historian and commentator al-Tabari writes:
Muhammad b. ‘Abd al-Al‘a – Ibn Thawr – Ma‘mar – al-Zuhri:
The inspiration ceased to come to the Messenger of God for a while, and he was deeply
grieved. He began to go to the tops of mountain crags, in order to fling himself
from them; but EVERY TIME he reached the summit of a mountain, Gabriel appeared
to him and said to him, "You are the Prophet of God." Thereupon his anxiety
would subside and he would come back to himself. (The History of al-Tabari: Muhammad at
Mecca, translated and annotated by W. Montgomery Watt and M.V. McDonald [State
University of New York Press (SUNY), Albany 1988], Volume VI (6), p. 76; bold and capital
emphasis ours)
Islamic sources say that the period of time that the spirit stopped coming to Muhammad
lasted anywhere between six months to three years! Sir William Muir noted:
The period succeeding the revelation of the 96th Sura, during which inspiration was
suspended, and Mahomet in despondency contemplated suicide, is generally represented as of
longer duration than in the above statement. This interval, styled the Fatrah or
"Intermission," is variously held to have lasted from six months to three years.
At its close, the 74th and 93rd Suras, containing assurance of mercy and the command to
preach, were delivered. The accounts, however, are throughout confused, if not
contradictory; and we can only gather with certainty that there was a time
(corresponding with the deductions which we have drawn from the Coran itself), during
which the mind of Mahomet hung in suspense, and doubted the Divine mission.28
(Muir, The Life of Muhammad, Volume II, CHAPTER THIRD: The Belief of Mahomet in
his own Inspiration, pp. 85-86; source;
bold emphasis ours)
Abdullah Yusuf Ali informs us that Q. 73,
… is one of the earliest Suras to have been revealed. The first was S. xcvi. 1-5 (Iqraa),
in the fortieth year of the Prophet’s life, say about 12 years before the Hijra. Then
there was an interruption (Fatra), of which the duration cannot be exactly
ascertained, as there was no external history connected with it. The usual estimate
puts it at about six months, but it may have been a year or two years. The years were
then counted by the luni-solar calendar… (Ali, The Holy Qur'an: Text, Translation
and Commentary, p. 1632; bold emphasis ours)
For more on Muhammad’s suicide attempts we recommend
this article.
Pay careful attention to what is being said by these references. On more than one
occasion Muhammad thought of throwing himself off a mountain and every time he tried to
kill himself a spirit would appear to stop him. This means that Muhammad continued to have
doubts despite the fact that the spirit always came to reassure him that he was
Allah’s messenger. Now if Muhammad could continue to have such fears for this entire
period of time, despite the fact that the spirit kept going out of his way to reassure him
over and over again that he was God’s apostle, then on what grounds does Zawadi want
to say that Q. 10:94 cannot actually mean that Muhammad had severe doubts about receiving
"revelations"?
In fact, if we tie in Q. 10:94 with the above data then this leads us to conclude that
Muhammad continued to have lingering doubts about his alleged prophethood up until his
flight to Medina. We say this since Muslim sources place the date of composition of Q. 10
at the final period of Muhammad’s stay at Mecca:
Time of Revelation
We have no tradition in regard to the time of it's revelation, but its subject
matter gives clear indication that it must have been revealed during the last stage of the
Holy Prophet's residence at Makkah. For the mode of the discourse suggests that at the
time of its revelation, the antagonism of the opponents of the Message had become so
intense that they could not tolerate even the presence of the Holy Prophet and his
followers among themselves, and that things had come to such a pass as to leave no hope
that they would ever understand and accept the Message of the Prophet. This indicates that
the last stage of the Prophet's life among thee people had come, and the final warning
like the one in this Surah had to be given. These characteristics of the discourse are
clear proof that it was revealed during the last stage of the Movement at Makkah.
Another thing that determines more specifically the order of the Surahs of the last
stage at Makkah is the mention (or absence) of some open or covert hint about Hijrat
(Emigration) from Makkah. As this Surah does not contain any hint whatsoever about this,
it is a proof that it preceded those surahs which contain it. (Syed Abu-Ala’ Maududi
‘s Chapter Introductions to the Qur’an;
source)
Let us also not forget that this wasn’t the only time Muhammad got rebuked for
being afraid or for faltering in his faith. There are many Quranic references where
Muhammad’s deity warns or rebukes him severely:
And when you said to him to whom Allah had shown favor and to whom you had shown a
favor: Keep your wife to yourself and be careful of (your duty to) Allah; and you
concealed in your soul what Allah would bring to light, and you feared men, and
Allah had a greater right that you should fear Him. But when Zaid had accomplished his
want of her, We gave her to you as a wife, so that there should be no difficulty for the
believers in respect of the wives of their adopted sons, when they have accomplished their
want of them; and Allah's command shall be performed. S. 33:37 Shakir
The above verse was recited during Muhammad’s stay at Medina. This next one took
place while he was still in Mecca:
Verily, they were about to tempt you away from that which We have revealed (the Qur'an)
unto you (O Muhammad SAW), to fabricate something other than it against Us, and then they
would certainly have taken you a friend! And had We not made you stand firm, you
would nearly have inclined to them a little. In that case, We would have
made you taste a double portion (of punishment) in this life and a double portion
(of punishment) after death. And then you would have found none to help you against Us.
S. 17:73-75 Hilali-Khan
Period of Revelation
The very first verse indicates that this Surah was revealed on the occasion of Mi`raj
(Ascension). According to the Traditions and books on the life of the Holy Prophet, this
event happened one year before Hijrah. Thus, this Surah is one of those which were
revealed in the last stage of Prophethood at Makkah.
Source
These texts expressly say that unless Allah had intervened Muhammad would have faltered
away and turned towards the unbelievers. In fact, according to one Muslim source these
verses were given in reference to Muhammad’s lapse into idolatry:
... Then the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, approached them (Quraysh) and got
close to them, and they also came near to him. One day he was sitting in their assembly
near the Ka‘bah, and he recited: "By the Star when it setteth", till he
reached, "Have ye thought upon Al-Uzza and Manat, the third, the other". Satan
made him repeat these two phrases: These idols are high and their intercession is expected.
The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, repeated them, and he went on reciting
the whole surah and then fell in prostration, and the people also fell in
prostration with him. Al-Walid Ibn Al-Mughirah, who was an old man and could not
prostrate, took a handful of dust to his forehead and prostrated on it. It is said:
Abu Uhayhah Sa‘id Ibn al-‘As, being an old man, took dust and prostrated on it.
Some people say: It was al-Walid who took the dust; others say: It was Abu Uhayhah; while
others say: Both did it. They were pleased with what the Apostle of Allah, may Allah
bless him, had uttered. They said: We know that Allah gives life and causes death. He
creates and gives us provisions, but our deities will intercede with Him, and in what
you have assigned to them, we are with you. These words pricked the Apostle of Allah,
may Allah bless him. He was sitting in his house and when it was evening, Gabriel, may
peace be upon him, came to him and REVISED the surah. Then Gabriel said: Did I
bring these two phrases. The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, said: I ascribed to
Allah, what He had not said. THEN ALLAH REVEALED TO HIM: "And they indeed strove hard
to beguile thee (Muhammad) away from that wherewith We have inspired thee, that thou
shouldst invent other than it against Us; and then would they have accepted thee as a
friend.
And if We had not made thee wholly firm thou mightest almost have inclined unto them a
little.
Then had We made thee taste a double (punishment) of living and a double (punishment)
of dying then hadst thou found to [sic] helper against Us.
... This prostration became known to people till the news reached Abyssinia and the
Companions of the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, that the people of Makkah fell in
protraction and joined Islam including al-Walid ... The people said: When such persons
have joined Islam, who else remains in Makkah? They said: Our relatives are dear to us. SO
THEY RETURNED. When they were at a distance of one hour’s walk from Makkah, they
confronted some horsemen of Kinanah. They inquired about the Quraysh and their affairs.
The horsemen said: MUHAMMAD SPOKE WELL OF THEIR DEITIES, SO THEY FOLLOWED HIM, but they
turned apostate. He began to abuse their gods and they began to harm him. We left them
in this struggle. They discussed that they should return to Abyssinia, but then they said:
We have reached here, so let us enter (the town), see the Quraysh and visit our families
and then return. (Ibn Sa’d, Kitab Al-Tabaqat Al- Kabir, English translation by
S. Moinul Haq, M.A., PH.D assisted by H.K. Ghazanfar M.A. [Kitab Bhavan Exporters &
Importers, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daryaganj, New Delhi- 110 002 India], Volume I, parts I &
II, pp. 237-238; bold and capital emphasis ours)
Hence, the foregoing emphatically and unambiguously demonstrates that Muhammad
continued to have doubts whether what he was receiving was truly from God or not and that
these fears of his didn’t stop after his first encounter with the spirit. Muhammad
continued doubting his prophetic calling for many years afterwards, at least for the
entirety of his stay at Mecca. This helps explain the rather harsh tone and dire threat of
Q. 10:94-95; Muhammad got rebuked by his deity since the latter became quite angry by the
constant doubts of his apostle even though a spirit had been sent to him on more than one
occasion to alleviate these lingering fears.
The above data leaves Zawadi with several options:
Muhammad lied that he wouldn't ask and that he didn’t doubt.
Muhammad started wavering in his faith and ended up having to ask in order to
reassure himself.
Zawadi's sources lied and forged reports to show that Muhammad would not ask
when he clearly did.
Both the Quran and the Islamic narratives are contradicting themselves.
Zawadi ends with a rather lengthy quote from Muslim author Dr. Muhammad M. Abu
Laylah’s book, The Qur'an and the Gospels: A Comparative Study, who cites
several Muslim explanations of Q. 10:94. Here are some specific parts from this quote
which are worth rebutting:
An-Nisaburi al-Tha'alibi's (d. 427 A. H.) Tafsir
stresses the semantic significance of the conditional: the expression "If you are in
doubt" does not in any way prove either the existence or non-existence of the
conditional matter; the same exegete, moreover, saw in this verse a clear proof
of the fact that the People of the books
had firm knowledge of the truthfulness of the Qur'an to the extent that they were in a
position to argue even with Muhammad (peace be upon him) himself on the subject of his
prophet hood and he concludes: "The verse thus describes the Rabbis' deep
knowledge of the authenticity of what God revealed to Muhammad (peace be upon him);
the verse does not describe the Prophet as having doubted."
(An-Nisaburi al-Tha'alibi, Ghara'yib Al-Qur'an, Wa Ragha'ib Al-Furqan, in
the margin of al-Tabari, Jami', vol. 11, pp. 116 f.)
… At-Tabari continues by saying: If
anybody asks, "Was the Prophet of God in doubt concerning the reality of God's
telling?" the answer must emphatically be 'no' (Ibid. [See also R. 2], p. 60)
At-Tabari's discussion is lengthy, and some of the points he makes arise in Ibn
Taymiyyah's contribution to the same issue - it is, however, essential to take note of one
particular statement made by him: The expression 'if you doubt', does not make it
necessary that Muhammad (peace be upon him) doubted. (From the linguistic point of view)
Arabs use such expressions, e.g., the master might say to his servant: 'If you are my
servant you must do such and such' when the master has no real doubt at all that the
servant addressed is his servant. Similarly an Arab might say to his son:'If you are my
son you will be kind to me'(Ibid.)
At-Tabari does not merely refer to colloquial use of the expression
in everyday life but draws an example from the Qur'an: God asked Jesus whether Jesus had
told the people: "Take me and my mother as Gods, apart from God" (Qur'an 5:116)
knowing full well that he had never done so. Thus the expression, as at-Tabari makes
clear, is nothing more than a rhetorical device. He concludes his argument by stating that
it was only natural that God should have talked to Muhammad (peace be upon him) in
phraseology appropriate to the Arabs in whose language the Qur'an itself was revealed.
(At-Tabari, Jami', vol. 11, p. 115)
The problem with the above assertions is that the immediate context doesn’t
support the position that this was nothing more than a rhetorical device:
But if you are in doubt as to what We have revealed to you, ask those who read the Book
before you; certainly the truth has come to you from your Lord, therefore you should
not be of the disputers. And you should not be of those who reject the communications of
Allah, (for) then you should be one of the losers. S. 10:94-95 Shakir
Muhammad is plainly told not to be among the doubters and rejectors of the revelation,
which clearly proves that he did have doubts. Moreover, the narrations which we cited
earlier further attest that Muhammad entertained severe fears and doubts to the point that
he even wanted to kill himself. Thus, both the immediate context and specific narratives
affirm the reality of the conditional, i.e. Muhammad did have doubts and needed to assuage
them by consulting the Jews and Christians. This isn’t any mere rhetorical or
colloquial expression.
Ibn Jarir at-Tabari (d.311 A.H.-923 A.D.)
comments on the verse: "God says to His Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) that if
you are in doubt about the truthfulness of what We told you in Revelations - that the
children of Israel had not differed concerning your prophet hood before you were sent by
God as an Apostle to His people, for they found you prophesied in their scripture, and
they knew you from the description of you given in the Torah and Injil - you must confer
with those who read the sacred book before you, that is, the people of the Torah and the
people of the Gospel, such as Abdullah Ibn Salam and those who, like him, were honest and
had faith in you: do not ask those who are dishonest or are unbelievers."
(At-Tabari, Jami', vol. II, p. 115)
At-Tabari reported Ibn Abbas as saying that
the book referred to in the verse was the Torah and the Gospel; the people with whom
Muhammad (peace be upon him) was commanded to confer were those who lived in Muhammad's
time and believed in him. The Prophet was to turn to them if questions as to the
foretelling of his own prophet hood in those books arose. The only object of possible
doubt was then Muhammad (peace be upon him) himself, and the people with whom he was to
confer were restricted to those who believed in his mission. Furthermore, Muhammad
(peace be upon him) had been prophesied in the scriptures - Jewish and Christian -
but these prophecies had been denied by the majority of Jews and Christians except for
those who had come to accept that such prophecies were truthful and had become Muslim.
Zawadi doesn’t realize that he is merely providing more proof that his sources are
filled with irreconcilable contradictions and that the Muslim scholars were a very
confused group of individuals. Here he sources Laylah who cites al-Tabari’s quote
from Ibn Abbas stating that the Scriptures in the hands of the Jews during Muhammad’s
time contained prophecies of Muhammad.
Yet all throughout
this article
Zawadi quotes other sources which say that the Jews corrupted their Scriptures since
they omitted these prophecies:
Ibn Abbaas said in his commentary on Surah 2:79...
(Therefore woe) severe punishment, and it is said
this means: a valley in Hell (be unto those who write the Scripture with their hands) change
the description and traits of Muhammad (pbuh) in the Book (and then say, " This is)
in the Book that has come (from Allah " , that they may purchase) through changing
and altering it (a small gain therewith) a small gain in terms of means of
subsistence and surplus of property. (Woe unto them) theirs is a severe punishment (for
what their hands have written) have altered (and woe unto them) and theirs is a severe
punishment (for what they earn thereby) of unlawful earnings and bribes.
(Ibn Abbaas, Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn 'Abbâs, Commentary on
Surah 2:79,
Source)
And:
Regarding the verse 'Confound not truth
with falsehood': The truth: it is the Torah that Allah revealed to Moses. Falsehood: it is
what they have written from their own hands.... It was reported that Ibn
Abbaas and others said 'Do not mix the truth of what you have in the Book with falsehood'
and that is the changing and substituting.
And Abu Al A'alya said that the Jews said 'Muhammad has arisen but not from
amongst us' so their acknowledgement of his arising is truth but their rejection of him is
false, and Ibn Zayd said: What is intended by 'truth' is the Torah and 'falsehood' is what
they substituted or changed from it from the mentioning of Muhammad peace be upon him and
other issues. Mujahid said: Do not mix Judaism and Christianity with Islam, and Qutada
said that as well. I say (Tabari): The statement of Ibn Abbaas is more correct because
it is more general and applies to the rest of the statements and Allah is the source of
all strength.
(Ibn Jarir al-Tabari, Jami' al-bayan fi ta'wil
al-Qur'an, Commentary on Surah 2:42,
Source)
Finally:
Abu al-Layth al-Samarqandi (d. 373 A.H.), the well known Hanafi scholar in his
commentary of the Qur'an known as Bahr al-'Ulum on Surah 2, verse 79 quotes
Az-Zajjaj as saying...
The leaders of the Jews erased the traits
and descriptions of the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, then they wrote things
besides his traits and descriptions.
Notice how the word 'erased' is used and then the same people 'wrote' different
descriptions of the Prophet to come. Az-Zajjaj clearly believed in the textual corruption
of the Torah.
Now what does Zawadi want his readers to believe? Should they believe that the Jews
corrupted their Scriptures since they omitted specific predictions of Muhammad? Or should
they adopt the view that the Scriptures at the time of Muhammad contain prophecies of his
advent which means that the Jews did not corrupt their texts? Moreover, what did Ibn Abbas
actually teach? Did he claim that the Jews omitted the prophecies of Muhammad thereby
corrupting their texts? Or did he actually teach that the Scriptures of the Jews did
contain predictions of Muhammad which means that they did not tamper with their Bibles?
More importantly, assuming that these narratives are correct that the Jews omitted
references to Muhammad (which they are not) this could only be true for the Bible
manuscripts (MSS) which were in their hands at that time. This could not be the case
with the MSS which were written before Muhammad’s time.
Moreover, the Jews were dispersed all over the world, from Europe to Africa to Asia.
Even if some Jews in Arabia had been tempted to tamper with their copies of the Torah to
erase Muhammad from it after they met him, what about the Jews in all those other places?
They would not have been able to even ask all the other Jews to make the same changes,
let alone get their agreement on doing so.
Al-Qurtubi's comment on the verse is to argue
that it speaks to the Prophet not as an object of doubt, but as a medium through which
people are commanded to ask for confirmation if they have doubts. Furthermore, he mentions
that Tha'alibi and al-Mubarrad had been credited with having said that the verse referred
specifically to pagan Arabs, its meanings thus being that if such pagans were in doubt
about the Qur'an they should ask Muslims who had been converted from Judaism, whom they
regarded as being more knowledgeable than themselves, to corroborate the veracity of the
Qur'an. (Abu 'Abdullah al-Qurtubi, op. cit., vol. 8, pp. 382 f.) Such an
interpretation is feasible; it does however contradict Muhammad's (peace be upon him)
response to the verses reported in the tradition referred to by an- Nisaburi. Ibn Hazm's
interpretation too, does not take account of this tradition and for this reason is
unacceptable to the present author as being an insufficient exegesis.
The major problem with al-Qurtubi’s exegesis is that if the author of the Quran
wanted to make sure that the reader didn’t think that Muhammad was being rebuked
here s/he could have made the address in the plural instead of the singular, i.e. "If
any of you are in doubt…" S/he could have even added the Arabic Qul
("Say") or the words "O mankind", or something of that nature, much
like s/he did several verses later:
Say (O Muhammad SAW): "O you mankind!If you are
in doubt as to my religion (Islam), then (know that) I will never worship those
whom you worship, besides Allah. But I worship Allah Who causes you to die, I am commanded
to be one of the believers. And (it is inspired to me): Direct your face (O Muhammad SAW)
entirely towards the religion Hanifa (Islamic Monotheism, i.e. to worship none but
Allah Alone), and never be one of the Mushrikun (those who ascribe partners to
Allah, polytheists, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah, and those who worship
others along with Allah). And invoke not besides Allah, any that will neither profit you,
nor hurt you, but if (in case) you did so, you shall certainly be one of the Zalimun
(polytheists and wrong-doers)… Say: "O you mankind! Now truth
(i.e. the Qur'an and Prophet Muhammad SAW), has come to you from your Lord. So whosoever
receives guidance, he does so for the good of his own self, and whosoever goes astray,
he does so to his own loss, and I am not (set) over you as a Wakil (disposer of
affairs to oblige you for guidance)." S. 10:104-106, 108 Hilali-Khan
Any combination of these would have clearly demonstrated that the rebuke wasn’t
directed to Muhammad. The author obviously didn’t use any of these expressions but
chose to use the singular address which makes it quite apparent that Muhammad was getting
rebuked at this point for wavering. Al-Qurtubi’s response is more of an attempt to
salvage Muhammad’s reputation and of trying to uphold the later Islamic position that
Muhammad had perfect faith and was absolutely sinless.
Conclusion
We conclude by noting that it is rather apparent that Zawadi is faced with a major
difficulty since the Islamic corpus is filled with gross contradictions. Zawadi sourced
certain narratives to prove that Muhammad would never ask the Jews and Christians because
he had no doubts, all of which directly contradict the verses and reports which we cited
here showing that he did ask the Jews and Christians since he was full of doubts.
In light of his confusion, is this the man that Muslims want us to believe in, a person
who was full of uncertainty and fears, who wasn’t certain of his fate and even
thought of killing himself?
Say: "I am no bringer of new-fangled doctrine among the apostles, nor do I
know what will be done with me or with you. I follow but that which is revealed to
me by inspiration; I am but a Warner open and clear." S. 46:9 Y. Ali
Narrated Abu Huraira:
When Allah revealed the Verse: "Warn your nearest kinsmen," Allah's Apostle got
up and said, "O people of Quraish (or said similar words)! Buy (i.e. save) yourselves
(from the Hellfire) as I cannot save you from Allah's Punishment; O Bani Abd Manaf!
I cannot save you from Allah's Punishment, O Safiya, the Aunt of Allah's Apostle! I
cannot save you from Allah's Punishment; O Fatima bint Muhammad! Ask me anything from
my wealth, but I cannot save you from Allah's Punishment." (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 51,
Number 16)
Narrated 'Um al-'Ala:
An Ansari woman who gave the pledge of allegiance to the Prophet that the Ansar drew lots
concerning the dwelling of the Emigrants. 'Uthman bin Maz'un was decided to dwell with
them (i.e. Um al-'Ala's family), 'Uthman fell ill and I nursed him till he died, and we
covered him with his clothes. Then the Prophet came to us and I (addressing the dead body)
said, "O Abu As-Sa'ib, may Allah's Mercy be on you! I bear witness that Allah has
honored you." On that the Prophet said, "How do you know that Allah has honored
him?" I replied, "I do not know. May my father and my mother be sacrificed for
you, O Allah's Apostle! But who else is worthy of it (if not 'Uthman)?" He said,
"As to him, by Allah, death has overtaken him, and I hope the best for him. By
Allah, though I am the Apostle of Allah, yet I do not know what Allah will do to me,"
By Allah, I will never assert the piety of anyone after him. That made me sad, and when I
slept I saw in a dream a flowing stream for 'Uthman bin Maz'un. I went to Allah's Apostle
and told him of it. He remarked, "That symbolizes his (good) deeds."
(Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58,
Number 266)
Do Muslim polemicists like Zawadi really think that true believers will embrace
such a man and turn away from Jesus Christ, the Living One?
"Jesus said to her, ‘Your brother will rise again.’ Martha said to him,
‘I know that he will rise again in the resurrection on the last day.’ Jesus said
to her, ‘I AM THE RESURRECTION AND THE LIFE. Whoever believes in me,
though he die, yet shall he live,and everyone who lives and believes
in me shall never die. Do you believe this?’ She said to him, ‘Yes,
Lord; I believe that you are the Christ, the Son of God, who is coming into the
world.’" John 11:23-27
"‘Let not your hearts be troubled. Believe in God; believe also in me.
In my Father’s house are many rooms. If it were not so, would I have told you that
I go to prepare a place for you? And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come
again and will take you to myself, that where I am you may be also. And you know
the way to where I am going.’ Thomas said to him, ‘Lord, we do not know where
you are going. How can we know the way?’ Jesus said to him, ‘I am the way,
and the truth, AND THE LIFE. No one comes to the Father except through me.’"
John 14:1-6
"When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. But he laid his right hand on
me, saying, ‘Fear not, I am the first and the last, and THE LIVING ONE.
I died, and behold I am alive forevermore, and I have the keys of Death and Hades.’"
Revelation 1:17-18
Endnote
(1) Since Zawadi wrote a second article on Muhammad doubting,
we decided to write a second rebuttal to address it. The first rebuttal is found
here.
The Holy Bible sternly warned Israel not to intermarry with the pagan nations lest they end up worshiping their gods/goddesses:
“Be sure to keep what I am commanding you this day: behold, I am going to drive out the Amorite before you, and the Canaanite, the Hittite, the Perizzite,
In this post I will show that the true God loves all nations equally, not just Israel. I will demonstrate that God commanded the Israelites to love the foreigner or non-Israelite as a fellow, native-born Israelite, and ordered that the same Law and commands equally apply to both Israelite and