Umar has followed up with yet another reply
(*)
to our response (*) regarding the status of Mariyah the Copt,
i.e. whether she was Muhammads slave or his wife.
We wont be addressing everything he says, since much of what he says really
doesnt rebut anything we had written. We will focus instead on a few of the main
points of his paper since this will help support our position.
Is it Marriage or Pleasure?
Umar says regarding the meaning of Sura 33:52:
So, even though Yusuf Ali says "After that the Prophet did not marry..",
the Ayat says he can marry any women that the Prophet (S) possesses (as handmaidens).
So Yusuf Ali, agrees with us, when he calls Mariyah a wife of the Holy Prophet (S),
however, he differs with us, regarding if she was a handmaiden or not. So let
us highlight the bottom line:
He also quotes another Answering Christianity writer Karim:
"Even if we for
the sake of argument accept tabaris[sic] time order, then still we can argue that
mariyah could aslo[sic] have been a slavegirl (which is also a strong option)
, and therefor[sic] in this case it doesn't matter if she arrived in medina at 6
A.H. or 7. A.H. since the prophet after ayat 33:52 was allowed to marryy[sic] slave
girls"
This is a rather curious reading of the text which says:
It is not lawful for you (to marry other) women after this, nor to change them for
other wives even though their beauty attracts you, except those (captives or slaves)
whom your right hand possesses. And Allah is Ever a Watcher over all things.
S. 33:52 Hilali-Khan
The natural and normal reading of this passage isnt that Muhammad was permitted
to marry one of his slave girls. On the contrary, the citation is stating that Muhammad
was permitted to have as many slave or captive women as he wished. To put it simply, this
reference is saying that even though Muhammad couldnt marry any more women he could
still have sex with as many slave or captive women as his heart desired.
The Quran, after all, does permit men to have women as sex slaves:
And if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with the orphangirls, then
marry (other) women of your choice, two or three, or four but if you fear that you shall
not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one or (the captives and the
slaves) that your right hands possess. That is nearer to prevent you from doing
injustice. S. 4:3 Hilali-Khan
Prohibited to you (For marriage) are:- Your mothers, daughters, sisters; father's
sisters, Mother's sisters; brother's daughters, sister's daughters; foster-mothers (Who
gave you suck), foster-sisters; your wives' mothers; your step-daughters under your
guardianship, born of your wives to whom ye have gone in, - no prohibition if ye have not
gone in; - (Those who have been) wives of your sons proceeding from your loins; and two
sisters in wedlock at one and the same time, except for what is past; for God is
Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful; - Also (prohibited are) women already married, except
those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath God ordained (Prohibitions) against
you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with
gifts from your property, - desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit
from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is
prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and God is All-knowing,
All-wise. S. 4:23-24 Y. Ali
And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts)
Except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess,
for then, they are free from blame; S. 23:5-6
O Prophet (Muhammad SAW)! Verily, We have made lawful to you your wives, to whom you
have paid their Mahr (bridal money given by the husband to his wife at the time of
marriage), and those (captives or slaves) whom your right hand possesses - whom Allah has
given to you, and the daughters of your Amm (paternal uncles) and the
daughters of your Ammah (paternal aunts) and the daughters of your Khal
(maternal uncles) and the daughters of your Khalah (maternal aunts) who migrated
(from Makkah) with you, and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, and
the Prophet wishes to marry her; a privilege for you only, not for the (rest of) the
believers. Indeed We know what We have enjoined upon them about their wives and
those (captives or slaves) whom their right hands possess, - in order that there
should be no difficulty on you. And Allah is Ever OftForgiving, Most Merciful. S. 33:50
Hilali-Khan
And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts from illegal sexual acts)
except with their wives and the (women slaves and captives) whom their right
hands possess, for (then) they are not to be blamed, S. 70:29-30 Hilali-Khan
Notice how some of the leading commentators exegeted this specific text. Al-Qurtubi
stated:
Mujahid, Saeed bin Jubayr, Ataa and Al Hakam said: {except what your right hand
possesses} means that you are not permitted to marry non-Muslims, such as Jewesses, and
Christians, and idolators, who are forbidden to you. You are not allowed to marry an
unbeliever since she will become one of the mothers of the believers, even if you like her
looks and beauty. EXCEPT what your right hand possesses [for] you can ENJOY them, as
in sleeping and having intercourse with them due to the fact that they are owned by you as
possessions
(Source)
Renowned commentator and historian al-Tabari wrote:
except what your right hand possesses means: you are not permitted to marry other women
after the ones that were permitted to you, EXCEPT what your right hand possesses from the
slave women, as you can possess as many of the slave women as you desire.
(Source)
The late Sayyid Abul ALa Maududi provided his own translation of Sura 33:52:
No other women are lawful for you after this, nor are you allowed to
have other wives instead of them, even if their beauty may be well pleasing to you. You
may, however, have slave-girls. Allah is Watchful over everything. (Maududi, The
Meaning of the Qur'an, English rendered by the Late Ch. Muhammad Akbar, edited by A.A.
Kamal, M.A. [Islamic Publications (Pvt.) Ltd., Lahore Pakistan, 4th edition,
August 2003], Volume IV, p. 127)
And then noted:
94. The verse explains why one is permitted to have conjugal relations with one's
slave-girls besides the wedded wives, and there is no restriction on their number. The
same thing has also been stated in Surah An-Nisa: 3, al-Mu'minun: 6, and al-Ma'arij: 30.
In all these verses the slave-girls have been mentioned as a separate class from the
wedded wives, and conjugal relations with them have been permitted. Moreover, verse 3
of Surah An-Nisa lays down the number of wives as four, but neither has Allah fixed
the number of slave-girls in that verse nor made any allusion to their number in other
relevant verses. Here, of course, the Holy Prophet is being addressed and told: "It
is not lawful for you to take other women in marriage, or divorce any of the present wives
and take another wife in her stead; slave-girls, however, are lawful." This shows
that no restriction has been imposed in respect of the slave-girls. (Ibid., p. 131)
Another renowned scholar and commentator, the late Mufti Shafi' Uthmani wrote:
... "Nor is it lawful that you replace them (the present wives) with other wives" - 52.
The clear meaning of these words in view of the second explanation of this
verse is that although the Holy Prophet is permitted to marry other women
besides his present wives subject to the conditions mentioned, yet it is not
lawful for him to divorce a wife and to marry another woman to replace her.
However, the meaning of these words in view of the first explanation of this
verse would be that he can neither marry any woman in addition to the
present wives, nor can he replace them by divorcing one and marrying
another.
Towards the end of these verses it is clarified that a bond woman owned
by the Holy Prophet is exempt from the fifth and seventh rules in the sense
that she is lawful for him, even if she is a Christian or Jew, and it is
also permitted for him to replace her with another bondwomen.
(Mufti Shafi Uthmani, Maariful Quran, Volume 7, p. 200;
source;
capital and underline emphasis ours)
By the fifth injunction the Mufti is referring to the statement found in Sura 33:50
which says that Muhammad could marry "believing women," which he takes to mean
that Muhammad was forbidden from marrying any non-Muslim woman even if she
were a Christian or Jew. The seventh injunction refers to the prohibition of Sura 33:52
where Muhammad is not allowed to marry any women besides those whom he already
had and whether this meant that he couldn't have any more wives at all or that he could
only marry women from among those made lawful for him as stipulated in Sura 33:50.
It is therefore obvious from the Mufti's statement that Muhammad was allowed
to take Christian or Jewish slave women for pleasure that this scholar believed
that the natural reading of Sura 33:52 meant that Muhammad could have as many
slave girls as he wanted provided that he didn't marry them.
The online Shiite Pooya/Ali commentary states:
Aqa Mahdi Puya says:
Allah commanded the Holy Prophet not to marry any woman
after the revelation of this verse.
Although his followers are prohibited to marry more than four women
(see commentary of Nisa: 3) but muta (temporary marriage) is allowed
in addition to four wives (see commentary of Nisa: 24).
(Source;
bold and underline emphasis ours)
The foregoing demonstrates that the passage is not saying that Muhammad could
marry a captive or slave woman, but that he could enjoy them without having to marry them.
This interpretation is even reflected in Yusuf Alis version:
It is not lawful for thee (to marry more) women after this, nor to change them for
(other) wives, even though their beauty attract thee, except any thy right hand should
possess (AS HANDMAIDENS): and God doth watch over all things. S. 33:52
Yusuf Ali clearly expressed the view that Muhammad could enjoy those whom his right
hand possessed as handmaidens, not as wives.
Furthermore, even if we concede for a moment that Umar is correct in his analysis of
the text this still wouldnt support his interpretation since the immediate context
only permitted Muhammad from enjoying those women who were taken as spoils of war:
O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their
dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given
thee as spoils of war, and the daughters of thine uncle on the father's side
and the daughters of thine aunts on the father's side, and the daughters of thine uncle on
the mother's side and the daughters of thine aunts on the mother's side who emigrated with
thee, and a believing woman if she give herself unto the Prophet and the Prophet desire to
ask her in marriage - a privilege for thee only, not for the (rest of) believers - We are
Aware of that which We enjoined upon them concerning their wives and those whom their
right hands possess - that thou mayst be free from blame, for Allah is ever Forgiving,
Merciful. Thou canst defer whom thou wilt of them and receive unto thee whom thou wilt, and
whomsoever thou desirest of those whom thou hast set aside (temporarily), it is no sin for
thee (to receive her again); that is better; that they may be comforted and not grieve,
and may all be pleased with what thou givest them. Allah knoweth what is in your hearts (O
men), and Allah is ever Forgiving, Clement. It is not allowed thee to take (other) women
henceforth, nor that thou shouldst change them for other wives even though their beauty
pleased thee, save those whom thy right hand possesseth. And Allah is
ever Watcher over all things. Sura 33:50-52 Pickthall
The problem for Umar is that Mariyah wasnt from the spoils of war but a gift
given to Muhammad, which disqualifies her for marriage! In fact, this is the very reason
why the following Muslims argued against the view that Muhammad married Mariyah:
Moreover, it is clear from the Quran (33:49-52) that the Prophet (sws)
could only free and marry slave girls who were made prisoners in war.
He was not allowed to marry gifted slave women that had been set free. (The Case of
Maria the Coptic; online source;
bold and underline emphasis ours)
As far as the slave girl Hadhrat Maria Qibtia (ra) is concerned, the Prophet
(pbuh) kept her as a slave girl because he was barred from marrying those slave
girls who were not part of the booty of war, in the same verse that governed his marriage
regulations. Hadhrat Maria Qibtia (ra) was presented to the Prophet (pbuh)
by the ruler of Egypt. He loved her very much and treated her very well, in order to set
an example for the Muslims in treatment of their slaves. (Mr. Amar Ellahi Lone, The
Marriages of the Prophet (pbuh);
online source;
bold and underline emphasis ours)
Still others believe that the expression "those whom your right hand
possesses" doesnt refer to slaves or captives at all. They take the view that
this is simply another way of referring to women that a person has married. Maulana
Muhammad Ali wrote:
52c. By those whom thy right hand possesses are indicated the wives of
the Prophet whom he lawfully married. (online source)
Muhammad Asad stated:
Some commentators (e.g., Tabari) assume that this restriction relates to the four
categories of women enumerated in verse 50 above: it is, however, much more probable
that it is a prohibition barring the Prophet from marrying any woman in addition to those
to whom he was already married (Baghawi, Zamakhshari). Some of the earliest, most
outstanding authorities on the Quran, like Ibn Abbas, Mujahid, Ad-Dahhak, Qatadah, Ibn
Zayd (all of them cited by Ibn Kathir), or Al-Hasan al-Basri (quoted by Tabari in his
commentary on verses 28-29), link this prohibition of further marriages with the choice
between the charms of worldly life and the good of the hereafter with which the wives of
the Prophet were confronted on the strength of verses 28-29, and their emphatic option for
"God and His Apostle" (cf. note on verse 29 above). All those early authorities
describe the revelation of verse 52 and the assurance which it was meant to convey to the
wives of the Prophet - as Gods reward, in this world, of their faith and fidelity. Since
it is inconceivable that the Prophet could have disregarded the categorical injunction,
"No [other] women shall henceforth be lawful to thee", the passage in question
cannot have been revealed earlier than the year 7 H., that is, the year in which the
conquest of Khaybar and the Prophets marriage with Safiyyah - his last marriage -
took place. Consequently, verses 28-29 (with which, as we have seen, verse 52 is closely
connected) must have been revealed at that later period, and not, as some commentators
think, in the year 5 H. (i.e., at the time of the Prophets marriage with Zaynab).
- I.e., to divorce any of them with a view to taking another wife in her stead
(with the prohibitive accent on the "supplanting"- i.e., divorcing - of any of
his wives). In my opinion, the expression ma malakat yaminuka
(lit., "what thy right hand possesses", or has come to possess") has
here the same meaning as in 4: 24, namely, "those whom thou hast come to possess
through wedlock" (see note on surah 4: 24); thus, the above verse is to
be understood as limiting the Prophets marriages to those already contracted.
(Asad, The Message of the Quran, ff. 65-67;
online source; bold and underline emphasis ours)
Moreover, Asad claimed that it is inconceivable that Muhammad could have violated the
Qurans command to marry other women, forcing him to conclude that this verse must
have been composed before 7 AH. Now let us compare this with Yusuf Alis note once
again:
This was revealed in A.H. 7. AFTER THAT the Prophet did not marry
again except the handmaiden Mary the Copt, who was sent as a present by the Christian
Muqauqas of Egypt. She became the mother of Ibrahim, who died in his infancy. (The
Quran: Text translation and Commentary by Abdullah Yusuf Ali, fn. 3754)
Umar cites another reference which basically agrees with Ali:
It is commonly agreed that it was after
the Prophet had married Maymuna, giving him now nine wives (A'isha, Sawda, Hafsa, Umm
Salama, Zainab bint Jahsh, Juwayriyya, Umm Habiba, Safiyya and Maymuna), that the
following ayat was revealed:
It is not lawful for you
(O Muhammad, to marry more) women after this, nor to exchange them for other wives, even
though their beauty is pleasing to you, except those whom your right hand possesses (as
maid servants); and Allah is always watching over everything. (Quran 33:52)
AFTER THIS, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be
upon him) did not marry again. When however, the Christian ruler, or Muqawqis, of
Egypt, sent him two Christian slave girls who were sisters as a gift (in response to the
Prophet's letter inviting him to embrace Islam), along with a fine robe and some medicine
the Prophet, accepted one of the slave girls, Maria, into his household; he gave her
sister Serene, to a man whom he wished to honor, namely Hassan ibn Thabit; he accepted the
robe; and he returned the medicine with the message, "My Sunna is my medicine!"
This occurred in 7 AH, when the Prophet was sixty years old and Maria was
twenty years old.
This source expressly says that Muhammad received Mariyah in 7 AH after the prohibition
of Sura 33:52 was given. Hence, Yusuf Ali and the above reference have Muhammad basically
marrying Mariyah after 7 AH, which Asad argued was inconceivable since this would mean
that Muhammad broke Allahs injunction!
More importantly, even if she did arrive before this prohibition was issued she still
wouldnt be eligible for marriage on the grounds that she was a gift and not a
prisoner of war. Muhammad, according to the context, was allowed to marry only captives
taken from the battle.
Here we summarize the various Muslim explanations regarding Sura 33:52:
The natural reading of the text isnt that Muhammad could marry any of the slave or
captive women in his possession. Rather, the verse is saying that Muhammad could enjoy as
many slave women as he desired, that he could have unlimited concubines. Since two of
Umars sources say that Mariyah came after this prohibition had been given Muhammad
couldnt have therefore married her without violating Allahs command.
Still others interpret the words "those whom thy right hand possesses"
as not referring to slave or captive women that Muhammad could enjoy, but to those whom
Muhammad had lawfully married. They thus see the last clause as reinforcing the point that
Muhammad could not take additional wives or replace the ones he had. Much like with the
first explanation, this interpretation rules out the possibility of Muhammad having
married Mariyah since she arrived after the prohibition had been passed.
The immediate context defines the slave women whom Muhammad could enjoy as those taken
as prisoners of war. This has led certain Muslims to conclude that Muhammad could not have
married Mariyah since she was a gift and not a prisoner of war. This also means that even
if Mariyah had been sent to Muhammad before the ruling of Sura 33:52, she still
wouldnt have been eligible for marriage.
Smoke and Mirrors
I had challenged Umar to explain to his readers whether he was advocating the position
that Muslims were free to marry Muhammads slaves after he died. Instead of answering
my question directly he decides to bring up an issue which has no direct relevance to my
challenge. He asserts that Muhammad didnt leave slaves after he died:
The Ayat itself [Sam- 33:53], is self explanatory, it clearly forbids the believers to
marry any of the "Mother of Believers", after the death of the Holy Prophet (S),
it has nothing to do with slaves! But, Sam Shamoun concludes, that even though this
ayat speaks only about the Mother of Believers, it will also include his
slaves, since the believers wouldn't dare sleep (or marry?) a woman the Prophet (S) had
relations with. But how can I advocate a position, that it was permissible for Muslim men
to marry or have sex with slaves of Muhammad (S) after his death, when he left no
slaves!
" 'Amr bin Hawairith has reported in Sahih Bukhari:
The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) did not leave
anything at his death, neither dirhams nor dinars nor a servant
or a maidservant nor anything except his white mule, arms and land which he gave in
charity"
(Source: Sirat Un Nabi by Syed Sulaiman Nadvi rendered into English by Mohd. Saeed
Siddiqui, Vol.III, p.120, Kitab Bhavan, New Delhi)
So Shamoun, please tell your readers that:
Since Prophet Muhammad (S) left no slaves after
his death, how can I advocate a position that it was permissible for Muslim men to marry
the slaves of the Prophet, when there WERE NO SLAVES LEFT BY THE PROPHET (S)!
Since Umar is clearly avoiding my challenge I will therefore try to elaborate so that
he will see how his answer doesnt address anything. Even though Umars source
claims that Muhammad didnt leave behind any slaves when he died the fact still
remains that Muhammad had concubines or female slaves with whom he had sex. In light of
the foregoing we want Umar to tell his readers whether these women whom Muhammad owned as
sex slaves were free to marry some other Muslim. We want him to tell his readers whether
these women with whom Muhammad had intimate relations and who had been freed upon
Muhammads death were allowed to marry another person, specifically another Muslim.
To make this even simpler so that Umar will not avoid answering my initial challenge
keep in mind that once Muhammad died his wives would be free from their marital bond. Yet
despite being widows and therefore freed from their marriage they still were forbidden
from remarrying. This shows that just because Muhammad didnt leave any slaves upon
his death this still doesnt explain whether those whom he physically enjoyed as his
possessions were free to marry someone else.
And we will make it easier for Umar to answer our question by citing the late Mufti
Uthmani who wrote:
The second Injunction
(And those (bond women) whom you own out of the captives Allah has given you
as spoils of war)
The word used here for the spoils of war is fai which in its
technical sense is restricted to the wealth acquired from the enemy without actual
fighting. But at times it is used for the spoils of war acquired through actual fighting.
Here the word is used in a general sense. Moreover, it does not mean that only those
slave-girls will be lawful for him who would come to him as a share in the spoils of war,
but the permissibility covers those bondwomen also who were purchased by him. But,
apparently, in this injunction, there is nothing particular for the Holy Prophet because
this is a rule for all Muslims and the whole Ummah that those bondwomen whom they own as
their share in the spoils of war or those who are purchased for a price are lawful for
them. At the same time the style of the context indicates that the injunctions contained
in these verses should have some special applications for the Holy Prophet. As such it
is stated in Ruh ul-Maani as a particularity of the Holy Prophet that just as
the nikah of any of his wives with any other Muslim is not lawful after him,
similarly any of his bondwomen is not lawful for any Muslim after him. Accordingly, the nikah
of Sayyidah Mariyah al-Qibtiyyah who was sent by the Roman Emperor Muqauqis as gift to the
Holy Prophet WAS NOT LAWFUL FOR ANYONE AFTER HIM. (Maariful Quran, Volume 7, pp. 191-192;
source;
capital and underline emphasis ours)
This shows that just because Muhammads concubines would be set free upon his
death this didnt give Muslims the right to marry them.
What makes this even more intriguing is that Umar has been arguing that Mariyah was
actually Muhammads wife which means that she was off limits for anyone else to marry
after Muhammads death! It is clear that Umar has not just confused his readers but
also confused himself by positing so many different, yet contradictory, arguments.
Now We Have A Contradiction!
Since Umar was in such a rush and so excited to refute Ali Sina and myself he seemed to
have overlooked the fact that his main reference which states that the majority of Muslim
scholars believe that Mariyah was a wife contradicts the so-called sound narrations. Here
is Umars quote:
However, the vast majority of Muslim scholars agreed that the wives of the prophet
(pbuh) were:
Khadijah
`Aisha bint Abu Bakr
Sawda bint Zum`ah
Hafsa bint `Umar
Zaynab bint Khuzaymah
Um-Habibah bint Abu Sufyan
Um-Salamah
Zaynab bint Jahsh
Juwariyah bint al-Harith
Safiyah bint Hayi ibn Akhtab
Maymunah al-Hilaliyah
Mariya al-Qibtiya (Who was from Egypt.)
(May Allah be pleased with all of them). These are the names upon whom the scholars agreed.
(source)
According to Muslim sources Khadijah died before Muhammad migrated to Medina. While he
was in Medina one of his wives died before he did, Zaynab bint Khuzaymah. If the above
list is correct then this means that Muhammad left behind ten wives when he died. Yet the
hadiths and the sira state that Muhammad had nine wives when he died, eight of whom he
would spend a day with:
The apostle consummated his marriage with eleven women, two of whom died before
him, namely Khadija and Zaynab. He died leaving the nine we have mentioned. With
two he had no marital relations, namely Asma d. al-Numan, the Kindite woman,
whom he married and found to be suffering from leprosy and so returned her to her people
with a suitable gift; and Amra d. Yazid the Kilab woman who was recently an
unbeliever. When she came to the apostle she said I seek Gods protection
against you, and he replied that the one who did that was inviolable so he sent her
back to her people. Others say that the one who said this was a Kindite woman, a cousin of
Asma d. al-Numan, and that the apostle summoned her and she said We are
a people to whom others come; we come to none! so he returned her to her people.
There were six Quraysh women among the prophets wives, namely, Khadija,
Aisha, Hafsa, Umm Habiba, Umm Salam, and Sauda.
The Arab women and others were seven, namely, Zaynab d. Jash, Maymuna, Zaynab d.
Khuzayma, Juwayriya, Asma, and Amra. The non-Arab woman was Safiya d. Huyay b.
Akhtab of B. al-Nadir. (The Life of Muhammad, A Translation of Ibn Ishaqs Sirat
Rasul Allah, with introduction and notes by Alfred Guillaume [Karachi Oxford
University Press, Karachi, Tenth Impression 1995), p. 794; bold and underline emphasis ours)
Narrated Ata:
We presented ourselves along with Ibn Abbas at the funeral procession of Maimuna at
a place called Sarif. Ibn Abbas said, "This is the wife of the Prophet so when
you lift her bier, do not jerk it or shake it much, but walk smoothly because the
Prophet had NINE WIVES and he used to observe the night turns with eight of them, AND FOR
ONE OF THEM THERE WAS NO NIGHT TURN." (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62,
Number 5)
Narrated Anas:
The Prophet I used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night,
and he had nine wives. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62,
Number 6)
Anas (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allahs Apostle (may peace be upon
him) had nine wives. So when he divided (his stay) with them, the turn of
the first wife did not come but on the ninth (day). They (all the wives) used to gather
every night in the house of one where he had to come (and stay that night). It was (the
night when he had to stay) in the house of Aisha (Allah be pleased with her),
when Zainab came there. He (the Holy Prophet) stretched his hand towards her (Zainab),
whereupon she (Aisha) said: It is Zainab. Allahs Apostle (may peace be
upon him) withdrew his hand. There was an altercation between the two until their voices
became loud (and it was at that time) when Iqama was pronounced for prayer. There happened
to come Abu Bakr and he heard their voices and said: Messenger of Allah, (kindly) come for
prayer, and throw dust in their mouths. So the Prophet (may peace be upon him) went out.
Aisha said: When Allahs Apostle (may peace be upon him) would finish his
prayer there would also come Abu Bakr and he would do as he does on such occasions (i. e.
reprimanding). When Allahs Apostle (may peace be upon him) had finished his prayer,
there came to her Abu Bakr and spoke to her (Aisha) in stern words and said:
Do you behave like this? (Sahih Muslim, Book 008,
Number 3450)
Al-Harith - Ibn Sa'd - Hisham b. Muhammad - My father reported to me that the Messenger
of God married fifteen women and consummated marriage with thirteen. He combined eleven
at a time and left behind nine. (History of al-Tabari: The Last Years of the Prophet,
translated and annotated by Ismail K. Poonawala [State University of New York Press (SUNY) Albany 1990],
pp. 126-127; bold and underline emphasis ours)
One modern commentary says regarding Sura 33:50 and 52 that:
Then after the death of Hazrat Khudaija he married the daughter of his greatest
companion Hazrat Aesha. Besides her eight widows came in his marriage and
after his expiration there were nine whose honourable names are:
Hazrat Aesha
Hazrat Hafsa
Hazrat Sauda
Hazrat Umme Salma
Hazrat Zainab
Hazrat Umme Habiba
Hazrat Juvairia
Hazrat Safya
Hazrat Maimoona
(Noble Quran: Tafseer-E-Usmani by Allama Shabbir Ahmad Usmani, English
translation by Mohammad Ashfaq Ahmad, M.A.M.Sc. [Idara Ishaat-e-Dinyat (P) Ltd.,
New Delhi, India 1992], pp. 1851-1852, fn. 711; bold and underline emphasis ours)
And:
73. All those described in the verse are lawful to thee, more than that is not
lawful. And to take in exchange for those who are now present is also not lawful i.e. to
leave anyone of them for the purpose of replacement is not allowed. It is quoted from
Hazrat Aesha and Umme Salma that this prohibition was withdrawn later on. But the
fact is that the Holy Prophet thereafter neither did any fresh marriage, nor took any in
exchange for them. At the time of his expiration all the wives were present.
(Ibid., p 1854; bold and underline emphasis ours)
Umar may want to argue that certain hadiths claim that Muhammad made rounds with eleven
of his wives which would therefore include Mariyah since without her the number would only
be ten. The problem with this view is that Muhammad didnt have eleven wives at one
time since Zaynab had died before Mariyah had arrived. Note the date which Umar places
Mariyahs arrival:
So if Mariyah Qibtiyya arrived at the Holy Prophet (S) household just after the Prophet
returned from signing the treaty, which occured[sic] in Dhi Qa'd of 6 A.H., then
the right dating of her arrival should be around the ending of A.H. 6 and the beginning of
7 A.H.
6-7 AH gives us a rough date of 629-630 AD. Yet Zaynab died roughly three to four years
before Mariyah arrived:
According to Ibn Umar [al-Waqidi] Kathir b. Zayd al-Muttalib b.
Abdallah b. Hantab, and also Muhammad b. Qudamah his father: The Prophet
asked Zaynab bt. Khuzaymah al-Hilaliyyah, Umm al-Masakin, in marriage, and she entrusted
her affairs to him. He let it be known that he gave her twelve and a half ounces [of gold]
as bridal gift. The marriage took place in Ramadan, thirty-one months after
Emigration/February 625. She stayed with him eight months, then died at the end of
Rabi II, thirty-nine months after [the Emigration]/October 626. The Prophet
said the prayers over her brier and buried her at al-Baqi. (The History of al-Tabari:
Biographies of the Prophets Companions and Their Successors, translated by Ella
Landau-Tasseron [State University of New York Press (SUNY), Albany 1998], Volume XXXIX
(39), p. 164; bold and capital emphasis ours)
With Zaynab dead, Muhammad would have had nine wives. If we then add Mariyah to the
list then this means that Muhammad had ten wives at one time, contradicting the traditions
which place the number at either nine or eleven.
Moreover, there seems to be a logical explanation why a tradition exists indicating
that the number of Muhammads wives during his later years was eleven. It seems that
some of the narrators were thinking of all the women Muhammad married, including Khadija
and Zaynab, which would bring the total to eleven. With this number in mind they may have
mistakenly narrated that Muhammad had eleven wives even later in his life. This explanation
seems quite plausible when we take into consideration the following narration:
Narrated Qatada:
Anas bin Malik said, "The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the
dayand night and they were eleven in number." I asked Anas, "Had the
Prophet the strength for it?" Anas replied, "We used to say that the Prophet was
given the strength of thirty (men)." And Said said on the authority of Qatada
that Anas had told him about nine wives ONLY (not eleven).
(Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5,
Number 268)
Note how one narrator corrects the previous narrators claim that according to
Anas Muhammad had eleven wives and says they were actually nine altogether. This furnishes
evidence that certain narrators mistakenly placed the number of wives at eleven due to
having in the back of their mind the fact that Muhammad had a total of eleven wives
throughout his lifetime.
The fact is that the unanimous position of the Muslim scholars is that
Muhammad left behind nine wives when he died. Note for instance the response
given by the Salafi scholars at www.Islamqa.com to the question of
whether Muhammad had eleven or nine wives:
The scholars differ concerning the number of wives that the Prophet (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) had. The majority are of the view -
WHICH IS CORRECT - that he had eleven wives with whom he (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) consummated marriage, AND HE LEFT NINE OF
THEM BEHIND WHEN HE DIED. Khadeejah bint Khuwaylid and Zaynab bint
Khuzaymah - may Allaah be pleased with them both - died before him (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him).
This is the view of his companions, as the imams narrated from them in
their saheeh books. ...
Mu'aadh ibn Hishaam narrated from his father, according to a report narrated
by al-Bukhaari (265) from him alone, that there were eleven wives, BUT HE
WAS MISTAKEN; the correct view is that he went around to nine wives.
Ibn Hajar said:
Ibn Khuzaymah said: Mu'aadh ibn Hishaam was the only one who narrated
that from his father, and it was narrated by Sa'eed ibn 'Uroobah and others from
Qataadah but they said "nine wives." Al-Bukhaari referred to the report of
Sa'eed ibn Abi 'Uroobah in a mu'allaq report here, but twenty chapters later
he narrated it in a mawsool report when he said: "He used to go around his
wives in one night, and at that time he had nine wives."
Fath al-Baari, 1/377.
Ibn al-Qayyim said:
There is NO SCHOLARLY DISPUTE concerning the fact that he left nine
behind when he died and that he used to give a portion of his time to eight
of them. Those nine were: 'Aa'ishah, Hafsah, Zaynab bint Jahsh, Umm
Salamah, Safiyyah, Umm Habeebah, Maymoonah, Sawdah and Juwayriyyah.
The first of his wives to follow him after he died was Zaynab bint Jahsh in 20
AH and the last of them to die was Umm Salamah in 62 AH during the caliphate
of Yazeed.
Zaad al-Ma'aad, 1/114
With regard to his female slaves, he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) had four female slaves.
Ibn al-Qayyim said:
Abu 'Ubaydah said: He had four: Maariyah who was the mother of his son
Ibraaheem; Rayhaanah; another beautiful slave women who he got among
some of the prisoners of war; and a slave woman who was given to him by
Zaynab bint Jahsh.
Zaad al-Ma'aad, 1/114. (Question #13344: Did the Prophet (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) have nine wives or eleven?;
source;
capital and underline emphasis ours)
Interestingly, this source lists Mariyah as one of the slaves of Muhammad,
not his wife!
Renowned Mu'tazilah scholar and grammarian al-Zamakhshari expressly stated that:
It is related that the Prophet (refrained from sexual intercourse and) put
off temporarily the following wives: Sauda, Juwairiya. Safiyya, Maimuna,
and Umm Habiba. In so doing he used to grant them a share (of sexual
intercourse) according to his wish. Among the wives whom the Prophet
preferred to take to himself belong 'A'isha, Hafsa, Umm Salama, and
Zainab (bint Jash). Thus, he used to put five off temporarily in order
to take four to himself. (On the other hand) it is related that,
disregarding divorce and the selection concerned with it, the Prophet
treated (all his wives) the same, with the exception of Sauda, who
relinquished the night belonging to her to 'A'isha and said (to the
Prophet): 'Do not divorce me but let me remain in the company of your
wives!' . Thereafter: after the nine (wives you have). That is,
NINE IS THE RIGHT NUMBER FOR THE MESSENGER OF GOD,
just as four is the right number for his community. HE IS NOT ALLOWED TO
EXCEED THIS NUMBER. Nor art thou permitted to take other wives in
exchange for them: ... (According to the revelation) the Prophet is restricted
to his nine wives (named above), whom he left behind (as widows) at his
death. (Helmut Gtje, The Qur'an and Its Exegesis, translated and edited
by Alford T. Welch [Oneworld Publications, Oxford England], pp. 90-91; bold
and capital emphasis ours)
A tafsir attributed to Ibn Abbas agrees:
(It is not allowed thee to take (other) women) to marry other women
(henceforth) after explaining these criteria; it is also said this
means: after your nine wives: 'A'ishah the daughter of Abu Bakr,
Hafsah the daughter of 'Umar, Zaynab Bint Jahsh al-Asdiyyah, Umm Salamah
Bint Abi Umayyah al-Makhzumi, Umm Habibah Bint Abi Sufyan Ibn Harb, Safiyyah
Bint Huyayy Ibn Akhtab, Maymunah Bint al-Harth al-Hilaliyyah, Sawdah Bint
Zam'ah Ibn al-Aswad and Juwayriyyah Bint al-Harith al-Mustaliqiyyah, (nor
that thou shouldst change them for other wives) among those I explained
amongst the daughters of your uncles and ants (even though their beauty
pleased thee) you are not allowed to marry them, (save those whom thy right
hand possesseth) Maria the Copt. (And Allah is Watcher over all things) and
Allah is Guardian over all things. (Tanwr al-Miqbs min Tafsr Ibn 'Abbs, Sura 33:52;
source)
It is obvious that Ibn Abbas, in light of his statement that Muhammad was
forbidden from exceeding nine wives (if indeed he said this), was placing
Mariyah as Muhammad's concubine whom he could enjoy sexually. If Ibn Abbas
meant that Muhammad did marry Mariyah then this would mean that he was
contradicting himself for saying that the latter could not exceed nine. Ibn Abbas
would basically be accusing Muhammad of violating Allah's orders.
Therefore, the foregoing data provides additional evidence, this time from the
so-called sound hadiths, that Mariyah could not have been one of Muhammads wives.
Another Contradiction: Aisha, Muhammads Only Virgin Bride?
There is another line of evidence which refutes Umars claim that Mariyah was
Muhammads bride. According to the so-called sound narrations Aisha was the only
virgin Muhammad married:
Narrated Ibn Abu Mulaika:
Ibn 'Abbas asked permission to visit Aisha before her death, and at that time she was
in a state of agony. She then said, "I am afraid that he will praise me too
much." And then it was said to her, "He is the cousin of Allah's Apostle and one
of the prominent Muslims." Then she said, "Allow him to enter." (When he
entered) he said, "How are you?" She replied, "I am alright if I fear
(Allah)." Ibn Abbas said, "Allah willing, you are alright as you are the wife of
Allah's Apostle and he did not marry any virgin except you and proof
of your innocence was revealed from the Heaven." Later on Ibn Az-Zubair entered after
him and 'Aisha said to him, "Ibn 'Abbas came to me and praised me greatly, but I wish
that I was a thing forgotten and out of sight." (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60,
Number 277)
Narrated 'Aisha:
I said, "O Allahs Apostle! Suppose you landed in a valley where there is a
tree of which something has been eaten and then you found trees of which nothing has
been eaten, of which tree would you let your camel graze?" He said, "(I
will let my camel graze) of the one of which nothing has been eaten before." (The
sub-narrator added: Aisha meant that Allahs Apostle had not married a
virgin besides herself ). (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62,
Number 14)
Another English version of al-Bukhari states:
IX. Marrying virgins
Ibn Abi Mulayka said that Ibn 'Abbas said to 'A'isha, "The Prophet, may Allah
bless him and grant him peace, did not marry any virgin besides me[sic]."
4789. It is related that 'A'isha said, "I said, 'Messenger of Allah, if you were
to alight in a valley which had a tree which had been eaten from and a trees which had not
been eaten from, on which of them would you graze your camel?' He replied, 'On the one
which had not been grazed on before.' By that she meant that the Prophet, may Allah bless
him and grant him peace, had not married a virgin besides her." (Aisha Bewley,
The Sahih Collection of Al-Bukhari, Chapter 70. Book of Marriage;
source)
Yet Mariyah was also a virgin when Muhammad received her. There are at least two strong
reasons for this. First, as a Christian she would not have been permitted to engage in
premarital sex. Recall that the Muqauqis was the Christian ruler of Egypt and would have
therefore been a follower of the tenets of Christianity. Second, kings and rulers send
each other "choice gifts" of supreme quality. Had Mariyah and her sister not
been virgins, this gift of "used women" would have been considered an insult
instead of an honor. For the second reason alone it would be inconceivable that Mariyah
was not a virgin, nor has any Muslim authority ever doubted this.
This implies that if Muhammad did marry Mariyah then Aisha wasnt his only virgin
spouse, which contradicts these so-called sound narrations of al-Bukhari which claim that
she was.
But since Muslims claim that the hadith collection of al-Bukhari have no weak or
defective reports this means that Umars sources are wrong for claiming that Muhammad
married Mariyah. The foregoing provides additional proof that Muhammad never married
Mariyah but merely kept her his sex slave.
Is the Majority Always Right?
Umar repeatedly asserts that the majority of Muslim scholars believe that Mariyah was
Muhammads wife:
It doesn't matter if the different views are found among the scholars, here is the
bottom line:
The majority agree, that she is indeed a wife of the Holy Prophet (S) !
He gets this information from the following source:
The books of sirah (the biography of the Prophet Muhammad) differ
on the number of his wives (may Allah bless all). The main reason behind the differences
in the number of his wives is - in most of the cases - due to the reliance on weak
non-authentic hadiths.
However, the vast majority of Muslim scholars agreed that the wives of the prophet (pbuh)
were:
Khadijah
`Aisha bint Abu Bakr
Sawda bint Zum`ah
Hafsa bint `Umar
Zaynab bint Khuzaymah
Um-Habibah bint Abu Sufyan
Um-Salamah
Zaynab bint Jahsh
Juwariyah bint al-Harith
Safiyah bint Hayi ibn Akhtab
Maymunah al-Hilaliyah
Mariya al-Qibtiya (Who was from Egypt.)
(May Allah be pleased with all of them). These are the names upon whom the scholars
agreed.
Some books list Mariya as a concubine, yet the opinion I more lean toward is that she was
one of the prophets wives and was not a concubine. Mariya was honored and respected
by the prophet (pbuh), as well as his family and companions. (Prophets Illiteracy
and Mariya;
source)
He also conveniently quotes only a portion of Wikipedias entry on Mariyah, but
doesnt bother to mention what they write under the subheading Maria and her sister
sent from the Patriarch:
Many Muslim sources say that Muhammad later freed and married Maria, but it is
not clear if this is historical fact or historical apology. Some Muslim traditions
claim that Muhammad offered to free Maria, but that she chose to remain a slave. To
further complicate matters, slaves were to be automatically freed upon conversion to
Islam, so it is not clear why Maria would have to be explicitly freed if she had already
converted. (Source,
as accessed on 16 March 2006; bold and underline emphasis ours)
All Umar is doing at this point is to commit the fallacy of appealing to the majority
(ad populum).
An important question that needs to be asked is who counts the "majority"
of scholars? This is one source that claims so, but how do we know that what the authors
of this reference have read really accounts for the majority? The majority of the early
commentators? The majority of recent commentators? Commentators who published in which
languages? Commentators from all Muslim sects or only from their own Muslim sect?
Furthermore, instead of counting evidence Umar needs to start weighing it. In other
words, it is not how many sources say a given thing, since the majority can be wrong as
history amply attests, but the weight and the value of the sources being presented. It
is the quality, not quantity, of the evidence that matters.
In our initial article, we presented several sources to prove our case, much of which
came from early and very credible Muslim scholars and historians. In fact, here is a list
of Muslims, both ancient and modern, which claim that Mariyah was a concubine or
didnt list her as one of the wives.
Ibn Ishaq.
Al-Tabari.
Ibn Kathir.
Al-Qurtubi.
Al-Jalalayn (the two Jalals).
Ibn Sad.
Ibn Abd al-Barr.
Abu Ubaydah
Ibn al-Qayyim.
Zubayr ibn Bakkar.
Mufti Shafi Uthmani.
Allama Shabbir Ahmad Usmani.
G.F. Haddad.
Mufti Ebrahim Desai.
Moiz Amjad of the www.understanding-islam.org website.
Tariq Mahmood Hashmi of the www.studying-islam.org website.
The Concise Encyclopaedia of Islam.
It has been Umars habit to discredit Muslim sources such as al-Tabari while
praising his own scholars who conveniently happen to agree with him, such as Allama Shibli
Naumani.
We provide here the view of the scholars of www.Islamqa.com regarding the commentaries
of al-Tabari and Ibn Kathir in order to put an end to Umars desperate tactics of
discrediting data which soundly refutes him:
Each of these Tafseers was written by a great Sunni scholar, and the scholars still
recommend them. Each of them has its own characteristics which means that the seeker
of knowledge cannot show preference to one of them over the other. There follow a few
comments on these two Tafseers.
They present quotes from Muslim scholars praising al-Tabari:
Abu Haamid al-Isfaraayini said: If a traveller were to travel to China in order to
obtain it, that would not be too much.
Tabaqaat al-Mufassireen by al-Dawoodi, 2/106.
Ibn Khuzaymah said: I have read it from beginning to end and I do not know of anyone
on the face of the earth who is more knowledgeable than Ibn Jareer.
Siyar Alaam al-Nubala, 14/273.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: With regard to the Tafseers that are
in circulation among the people, the most sound of them is the Tafseer of Muhammad
ibn Jareer al-Tabari, for he mentions the views of the salaf with proven isnaads,
and there is no bidah (innovation) in it, and he does not transmit reports
from dubious sources such as Muqaatil ibn Bukayr and al-Kalbi.
Majmoo al-Fataawa, 13/358.
He also said in Muqaddimah fi Usool al-Tafseer (p. 35),
concerning the Tafseer of Ibn Jareer:
It is one of the best and greatest of Tafseers.
He relied on the views of three generations of mufassireen among the
salaf, namely the Sahaabah, the Taabieen, and the followers of the Taabieen,
and he quotes their opinions with isnaads going back to them. This is an important feature
of his book which is not present in many of the books of Tafseer that are in circulation
among us. But this feature does not matter to many ordinary Muslims who are not able to
research isnaads and distinguish sound isnaads from weak ones; all they want is to know
whether an isnaad is sound or weak by means of a clear and brief statement to that effect.
When he has finished quoting their opinions, he states which he thinks
is most likely to be correct, then he describes how he reached that conclusion.
They also write concerning Ibn Kathir that:
Al-Suyooti (may Allaah have mercy on him) said concerning this Tafseer:
Nothing like it has ever been written.
Tadhkirat al-Huffaaz, p. 534.
This Tafseer is based on commentary by quoting texts verses and ahaadeeth
and its fame is second to the fame of al-Tabari among later scholars.
It is written in an excellent and easy style which is not longwinded or
boring, or too short and boring.
He explains verses by quoting other verses, and he quotes appropriate
verses which explain the verse under discussion; then he quotes ahaadeeth that have been
narrated on the same topic as the verse, and he quotes the isnaads of some, especially
those that were narrated by Imam Ahmad in his Musnad, as he is one of those who
memorized al-Musnad. He discusses the soundness and weakness of the ahaadeeth in
most cases, which is an important feature of his Tafseer. Then he quotes the views of the
salaf, including the Sahaabah and Taabieen, and he states which view he believes to
be superior. He also avoids odd dissenting opinions.
Muhammad ibn Jafar al-Kataani said of it: It is full of ahaadeeth and reports
with the isnaads of those who narrated them and discussion of how sound or weak they are.
Al-Risaalah al-Mustatrafah, p. 195
He draws attention to the shari attitude towards the
Israaeeliyyaat (reports from Jewish sources) and quotes some of them in his
commentary on some verses.
They then conclude by saying:
No seeker of knowledge can do without these two books. With regard to
which is superior, nothing like the Tafseer of Ibn Jareer (al-Tabari) has been written
since. It is essential for scholars and seekers of knowledge, but it is not appropriate
for ordinary people because they are not qualified to understand it properly. The Tafseer
of Ibn Katheer is more appropriate for the ordinary people, and there is much in it from
which scholars and seekers of knowledge can benefit. (Question #43778: Which is
more sound, Tafseer Ibn Katheer or Tafseer al-Tabari?;
online source;
bold and underline emphasis ours)
Sunni author GF Haddad concurs with the assessment www.islamqa.com
regarding al-Tabari:
Muhammad ibn Jarir ibn Yazid ibn Kathir, Abu Ja`far al-Tabari (d. 310),
one of the major mujtahid Imams and the founder of a school of Law which
remained for 150 years after his death, then disappeared. He is the author
of a massive commentary on the Qur'an; an equally large universal history;
a biographical history entitled Tarikh al-Rijal; an encyclopedia of
jurisprudence entitled al-Basit and a medium-sized work entitled Latif
al-Qawl fi Ahkam Shara'i` al-Islam, which he abridged into a smaller work;
a book on the dialects and sciences of the Qur'an entitled al-Qira'at wa
al-Tanzil wa al-`Adad; the unfinished book of al-Fada'il on the immense
merits of the Companions; al-Manasik on the rituals of Pilgrimage; Sharh
al-Sunna ("Explanation of the Sunna"); al-Musnad ("Narrations With
Uninterrupted Chains"); the unfinished Tahdhib al-Athar ("Classification of
Transmitted Reports"); Tabsir Uli al-Nahi ("Admonishment for the Wise")
for the people of Tabaristan; Ma`alim al-Huda ("Sign-Posts of Guidance");
Ikhtilaf al-Fuqaha' ("The Differences Among the Jurists"); Tartib al-`Ulama'
("Classification of the Scholars of Knowledge") etc. Al-Dhahabi praises the
latter book and mentions that al-Tabari begins it with the rules of conduct
for the purification of the self and the sayings of the Sufis... Al-Tabari
limited his Tafsir of the Qur'an and his great history to thirty volumes
each out of compassion for his students, as he originally intended to write
three hundred volumes respectively. Al-Khatib heard the linguist `Ali ibn
`Ubayd Allah al-Lughawi say: "Muhammad ibn Jarir spent forty years writing
forty pages a day." Abu Hamid al-Isfarayini the faqih said: "If a man
travelled all the way to China in order to obtain the Tafsir of Muhammad ibn
Jarir it would not be too much." This alludes to the hadith narrated from
the Prophet -- Allah bless and greet him --: "Seek knowledge even as far as
China." Husaynak ibn `Ali al-Naysaburi said the first question Ibn Khuzayma
asked him was: "Did you write anything from Muhammad ibn Jarir?" Husaynak
said no. Why? came the reply. Husaynak said: "He would not show himself, and
the Hanbalis forbade people from going in to see him." Ibn Khuzayma said:
"You did poorly. To write from him alone would have been better for you than
all those from whom you wrote." ... (Haddad, AL-TABARI;
source)
Even though these quotes refer mainly to al-Tabaris commentary they still provide
an idea of the kind of researcher and scholar al-Tabari truly was. His scholarship
and meticulous research provides a strong basis for trusting his statements in his
"History" regarding Mariyahs status, especially when there are other
scholars and sources that agree with him on this point.
Thus, we have given weighty evidence, as well as numerous references, to support our
position. We therefore challenge Umar to list the names of this so-called majority of
scholars in order to see just how old and credible they are.
And Now The Clincher
The readers will remember that the status of Mariyah became an issue because of the
comments made by Ali Sina of www.faithfreedom.org.
In one of his article he had written that:
The following is Muhammads scandalous love affair with Mariyah the Copt who
was one of the prophets wives maids. Muhammad slept with her without any
ceremony, which caused uproar among his wives and finally was settled by Divine
intervention. This story is recorded in an authenticated Hadith and is reported by
Omar One-day Muhammad goes to his wifes house Hafsa the daughter of Omar and
finds her maid Mariyah attractive. He sends Hafsa to Omars house, telling her
that he wanted to see her. When Hafsa leaves, Muhammad takes Mariyah to bed and has
intercourse with her. Meanwhile Hafsa, who finds out that her father was not expecting
her, returns home much sooner than expected, and to her chagrin finds her illustrious
husband in bed with her maid. (Mariyah the Sex Slave of the holy Prophet;
source; underline emphasis ours)
Sinas claim that Mariyah was Hafsas maid caused quite a furor among
Muslims. The typical response was that Sina was deliberately lying since there is no
Islamic source which says Mariyah was a maid of Hafsas.
What makes this all the more interesting is that Umar, in his latest rebuttal, has actually
come to vindicate Sina and provided support for his statements. Umar quotes his brother
Karim who says:
Brother Karim replies to this already, here is his response:
" Actually Shamoun
doesn't understand that the Prophet was fair in dealing with his wifes[sic], since
the Quran commands Muslim men who are married to more then one wife, to deal fair/equal
and just with them. The Prophet's wifes[sic] had each an own house/ livingroom, and
the Prophet gave each wife a day of the week, for example the Prophet spend time with
aicha[sic] together on friday, and on saterday[sic] he spend time with
Safiyya. So the prophet could very well for example on sunday spend his time with his wife
Mariyah. So the fact that a wife doesn't live in the same street of the prophet doesn't
mean she can never be his wife. Actually a slave has to work for the household, which
means for the man and woman of the house (many hadith bear witness to this) , so if
Mariyah was slave, IT MEANS SHE ALSO HAD TO WORK FOR THE PROPHETS WIFES[SIC], IF
THEY AKSED[SIC] HER TO DO SOMETHING IN THE HOUSE OR ON THE LAND. So Mariyah could
never be the Prophet's slave, since she couldn't do any work for the prophet and his
wifes[sic]. However the prophet as her husband could easily spend one day of the
week with mariya, as her husband"
We repeat the relevant portion for all to see the slip made by the authors:
so if Mariyah was slave, IT MEANS SHE ALSO HAD TO WORK FOR THE PROPHETS
WIFES[SIC], IF THEY AKSED[SIC] HER TO DO SOMETHING IN THE HOUSE OR ON THE LAND
What this essentially means is that Mariyah was not only Muhammads slave but the
servant of all of his wives as well, WHICH BASICALLY IMPLIES THAT SHE WAS ALSO
HAFSAS SLAVE! These authors have now vindicated Ali Sina, proving that he was
correct to identify Mariyah as Hafsas maid! After all, if she were obligated to
serve his wives then she would have been a servant of Hafsa as well.
Umar has demonstrated what basically happens when a person doesnt think through
the issues and reflect on the answers carefully. He makes concessions and ends up
contradicting himself from one rebuttal to the next.
Moreover, Karims argument really doesnt have much force to it. Muhammad
could just as well have kept Mariyah as a sex slave, which wouldnt require her to perform
any duties for his wives. After all, the reverse does not seem to be the case. Certainly, it would be
up to the owner, Muhammad, to decide what duties his slave-girl has, whether only being available
to him for physical pleasure, or also doing work in the house, or the garden, or aiding one or several
or all of his wives in their duties. But if the owner wants, he can certainly reserve her for himself
exclusively, and she would then not have had to work for the wives.
Be that as it may, Karims comments provide support for Sinas argument
regarding Mariyah being Hafsas maid.
Now watch as Umar scrabbles to find a way of correcting this major slip
in order to try to do some damage control.
Some Final Remarks
In his haste to "refute" me, Umar responds to my point that Sura 4:128-130
gave Muhammad sanction to neglect his wife by claiming that I misunderstood Sura 4:34!
He writes:
Sam Shamoun now shows how ignorant he is of Sura 4:34, where Allah Almighty tells men,
that they are the "protectors and maintainers of women":
It is very hard to see how I could be called ignorant of Sura 4:34 when I never even
mentioned it in my rebuttal! It seems that Umar simply copied and pasted this section from
another rebuttal addressing another article I had written where I discuss this specific
text.
Moreover, despite the fact that the data overwhelmingly supports the position that
Mariyah was Muhammads slave, not his wife, that is still not the real issue.
As we have seen throughout these series of exchanges there are Muslim sources which
do say that Muhammad married Mariyah.
Here is the real issue: Recall that in our initial and first rebuttal we were
addressing the assertions of two Muslims who DENIED that Mariyah was Muhammads
slave:
Looking at any reputable source will tell you that Muhammad (PBUH) and Mariyah (RA)
were legally married (Bahagia, Muhammad (PBUH) and Mariyah (RA);
source)
And:
Our Response:
Ali Sina begins his article, with a CLEAR-CUT LIE!
Mariyah the Copt wasn't just a servant, she was the Prophets (S) own Wife!
(Bassam Zawadi, Rebuttal to Ali Sina's article: "Mariyah the Sex
Slave of the holy Prophet"; original version of
this article) [1]
Hence, the issue at hand is whether there is evidence from Islamic sources which
emphatically say that Muhammad never married Mariyah and that she remained his slave until
he died. As we have demonstrated, and as Umar himself had to concede, there is plenty of
evidence for this view. These Muslims were therefore wrong for claiming otherwise or for
selectively choosing data which supported their position while ignoring other references
which disagreed with their claim. That was the point of our rebuttal. Whether Mariyah was
Muhammads slave or his wife, or even a slave whom he later married, is beside the
point.
We conclude with a summary of all the conflicting views and gross contradictions
posited by the various Muslim sources.
Muslim sources present contradictory dates for Surah 33, specifically 33:52.
Muslim sources contradict one another regarding whether Sura 33:52 was abrogated
by Sura 33:50 or not.
Muslim sources indicate that Sura 33:50 was given before Sura 33:52, which means that
the abrogating verse actually came before the verse which it was suppose to abrogate!
Muslim sources contradict one another whether Mariyah was Muhammad's wife or concubine.
The so-called sound narrations (the sahih ahadith) say that Muhammad had a total of nine
wives, a number which excludes Mariyah from being a wife since including her would raise
the number to ten.
Muslim sources disagree whether Sura 33:52 prohibited Muhammad from marrying all women,
including slaves, or whether he was prohibited from marrying slave women who were not
spoils of war.
The foregoing exposes the mass confusion that exists within Islamic scholarship and how
utterly chaotic the religion of Islam truly is.
Recommended Reading
If the readers are interested in seeing how well Umar did in defending his thesis
against agnostics and atheists we recommend reading the posts found on
this link.
Umars name in the forum is QuranSearch.Com.
Notes:
[1] After realizing that there are Muslim sources which do teach that Mariyah
was Muhammads slave, not his wife, Zawadi was humble enough to change his initial
position against Sina:
Our Response:
Previously I accused Ali Sina of being
a liar when he said that Mariyah was only a slave of the Prophet. It turns out that
there is a difference in opinion regarding if Mariyah was the Prophet's wife or
slave. So I apologize to Sina for that. However, even though, Ali Sina fails
to prove anything against the Prophet.
We truly respect and appreciate Zawadis willingness to correct himself when
realizing he has made a mistake. There is nothing wrong with being mistaken since we all
can be wrong and commit errors in our speeches and writings.
The Holy Bible sternly warned Israel not to intermarry with the pagan nations lest they end up worshiping their gods/goddesses:
“Be sure to keep what I am commanding you this day: behold, I am going to drive out the Amorite before you, and the Canaanite, the Hittite, the Perizzite,
In this post I will show that the true God loves all nations equally, not just Israel. I will demonstrate that God commanded the Israelites to love the foreigner or non-Israelite as a fellow, native-born Israelite, and ordered that the same Law and commands equally apply to both Israelite and