trinity
Biblical and theological defenses of the Triune nature of God with rigorous exegesis.
Jesus Is indeed God Incarnate Paid Members Public
Which Is Why He Is Able To Forgive Sins! Pt. 3 Sam Shamoun We continue with our response to Williams’ distortion of Biblical truth. Williams writes: ii) Then notice Jesus’ words: ‘But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins…” Who
Jesus Is indeed God Incarnate Paid Members Public
Which Is Why He Is Able To Forgive Sins! Pt. 2 Sam Shamoun This is the second part of our rebuttal. Jesus said and did other things in Matthew which shows that he is God, such as announcing that he would personally send out prophets: “Therefore I SEND YOU PROPHETS
Jesus Is indeed God Incarnate Paid Members Public
Which Is Why He Is Able To Forgive Sins! Pt. 1 Sam Shamoun Paul Bilal Williams happens to be another dawagandist who doesn’t even try to mask his utter hatred for the Holy Bible and Christianity. This is why he has no problem citing scholars against Christianity whose presuppositions
“Let us make man” and the Cohortative Mood Paid Members Public
Another Muslim Attempt at Denying The Trinitarian Implications of Genesis 1:26 Sam Shamoun There is a rather strong passage in Genesis 1 to God being multi-personal as opposed to uni-personal. It comes from the description of man’s creation in the image of God: “Then God said, ‘Let US
Revisiting the Issue of Jesus Forgiving Sins Paid Members Public
Sam Shamoun Christophobe and taqiyyist extraordinaire Paul Bilal Williams has posted a link to a video by a so-called Christian unitarian who attempts to explain away the Gospels’ explicit testimony to Jesus’ intrinsic authority to forgive sins. Williams writes: Who can forgive sins but God alone? An interesting take on
Addressing Paul Williams’ False Accusations Pt. 6 Paid Members Public
Sam Shamoun We now come to the final part of our rebuttal. Williams attempts to defend Muhammad’s teaching that Allah will torture Jews and Christians as a sacrifice for the sins committed by Muslims. In order for the readers to follow along we will again quote one of the
Addressing Paul Williams’ False Accusations Pt. 5 Paid Members Public
Sam Shamoun We continue our discussion. What Williams does next is absolutely astounding. He tries to call into question the Eucharistic passages found in the Gospels by claiming that Paul may have influenced them! He writes: 1) Let us look at the earliest account we have in Paul’s first
Addressing Paul Williams’ False Accusations Pt. 3 Paid Members Public
Sam Shamoun We resume our discussion. Williams would also like me to address his misuse of Jesus’ words to the rich young ruler that is found in Mark 10:17-25 and Matthew 19:16-24 (as well as Luke 18:18-25). Since he takes a cheap shot at me by stating