responses
Detailed responses to Islamic assertions, critiques, and controversies, offering thorough scriptural and historical counter-arguments.
Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo's Article: Christian Scholars Refuting the Status of the NT as An Inspired Paid Members Public
A Critique of Johnny Bravo's Response to Sam Shamoun's "Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo's Article: Christian Scholars Refuting the Status of the NT as An Inspired Scripture " Part 3 [A], [B], [C] The following is my response to the claims set forth by
Response to Sam Shamoun's " Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo's Article: Christian Scholars Refuting the Status of the NT as An Inspired Paid Members Public
A Critique of Johnny Bravo's Response to Sam Shamoun's "Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo's Article: Christian Scholars Refuting the Status of the NT as An Inspired Scripture " Part 2 [A], [B], [C] This is the third and final installment in my rebuttal. Bravo
Rebuttal to Bismikaallahuma : Response to Sam Shamoun's " Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo's Article: Christian Scholars Refuting the Status of the NT as An Inspired Paid Members Public
A Critique of Johnny Bravo's Response to Sam Shamoun's "Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo's Article: Christian Scholars Refuting the Status of the NT as An Inspired Scripture " Part 2 [A], [B], [C] This is the second part of my rebuttal to Bravo'
Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo: Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT as an inspired scripture [Appendix] Paid Members Public
[Part 1], [Part 2], [Part 3], [Part 4], [Part 5], [Part 6], [Part 7], [Appendix] Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo's Article "Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT as an inspired scripture" (Appendix) Addressing Some Arguments in Support of the Apocrypha In this short Appendix we
Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo: Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT as an inspired scripture [Part 9] Paid Members Public
[Part 1], [Part 2], [Part 3], [Part 4], [Part 5], [Part 6], [Part 7], [Part 8], [Appendix] Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo's Article "Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT as an inspired scripture" (Part 9) The Biblical and Patristic Witness to the NT Canon (II)
Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo: Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT as an inspired scripture [Part 6] Paid Members Public
[Part 1], [Part 2], [Part 3], [Part 4], [Part 5], [Part 6], [Part 7], [Appendix] Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo's Article "Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT as an inspired scripture" (Part 6) THE OLD TESTAMENT CANON (I) We begin a series of responses to
Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo: Johnny Bravo and The Interpreter's Bible [Part 5] Paid Members Public
[Part 1], [Part 2], [Part 3], [Part 4], [Part 5], [Part 6], [Part 7], [Appendix] Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo's Article "Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT as an inspired scripture" (Part 5) The following is Dr. James D. Price's response to Bravo&
Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo: Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT as an inspired scripture [Part 4] Paid Members Public
[Part 1], [Part 2], [Part 3], [Part 4], [Part 5], [Part 6], [Part 7], [Appendix] Rebuttal to Johnny Bravo's Article "Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT as an inspired scripture" (Part 4) [The following series are a rebuttal to the claims set forth by
