christianity
Defense and explanation of Christian doctrine, practice, and worldview through rigorous biblical argumentation.
Jesus as “a god” alongside God ADDENDUM Paid Members Public
Galatians 4:8 and the Trinity Coming to the conclusion of our series https://answeringislam.blog/jesus-as-a-god-alongside-god-pt-3/, we address the objection of Arian apologist Greg Stafford who takes issue with Evangelicals using Galatians 4:8 to deny the existence of angelic gods: Galatians 4:8 is often misused to prove
Jesus as “a god” alongside God Pt. 3 Paid Members Public
We resume our discussion https://answeringislam.blog/jesus-as-a-god-alongside-god-pt-2/ We now turn to the second point, namely that De 32:39 refers to God’s activity. Sanders’ claim that there was no other god besides Yahweh who acted on Israel’s behalf provides additional proof that the JW position is unbiblical.
Jesus as “a god” alongside God Pt. 2 Paid Members Public
We continue from where we previously left off https://answeringislam.blog/jesus-as-a-god-alongside-god-pt-1/ Regarding demons, the Watchtower publication Insight on the Scriptures, Volume 1, pp. 612-613, says: The demons as such were not created by God. The first to make himself one was Satan the Devil (see SATAN), who became ruler
Jesus as “a god” alongside God Pt. 1 Paid Members Public
Jehovah’s Witnesses and John 1:1 There has been much discussion regarding the translation of John 1:1 and the significance it has in our understanding of the Lord Jesus Christ. Evangelicals insist that John 1:1, when properly exegeted, provides irrefutable proof that Jesus is fully and eternally
Shaming the Shameless Pt. 3a Paid Members Public
It is time, once again, to “shame” Jehovah’s Witness apologist Bernard Maina who never seems to learn his lesson. Here are the comments that he sent me in response to my last post https://answeringislam.blog/shaming-the-shameless-pt-2a/ where I took his use of the Authorized King James Version (AV)
The Byzantine Christians: Antagonists or Antagonized? Addendum Paid Members Public
In this final segment https://answeringislam.blog/the-byzantine-christians-antagonists-or-antagonized-pt-3/, we are going to cite some additional reports, which further give the readers an idea of the real reason behind all of Muhammad’s raids upon unsuspecting victims. Truth be told, Muhammad and his men were nothing more than murdering bandits who
The Byzantine Christians: Antagonists or Antagonized? Pt. 3 Paid Members Public
Continuing from where we previously left off https://answeringislam.blog/the-byzantine-christians-antagonists-or-antagonized-pt-2/ , we are going to quote some additional Islamic references proving that it was Muhammad who had the audacity to send threatening letters to certain Christian tribes and rulers, including the Byzantine Emperor, threatening to attack them if they did
The Byzantine Christians: Antagonists or Antagonized? Pt. 2 Paid Members Public
In this part of my discussion https://answeringislam.blog/the-byzantine-christians-antagonists-or-antagonized-pt-1/ I am going to be addressing the claims of some Muhammadan apologists that Q. 9:29 was composed primarily because Muhammad supposedly received news that the Byzantine Christians were planning to attack the Muslims. These Islamic propagandists are hoping to