bible
In-depth examinations of Scripture, textual reliability, theological themes, and defense of biblical doctrine.
On Nadir Ahmed's Review of the Abdallah-Shamoun Debate Paid Members Public
More Evidence for Hypocrisy in Nadir Ahmed's Debate Challenge A Look at NA's ‘Review’ of the Abdallah-Shamoun Debate This is a follow-up on our detailed response to NA's ‘debate challenges’, given in the article "Hunter or Hunted?", which you may want to
Rebuttals to Islamic Awareness Paid Members Public
Responses to Islamic Awareness Hadth From Sunan ad-Drimi Concerning Prophet Moses(P) Following Prophet Muhammad(P) If The Former Were Alive Today by Muhammad Ghoniem Refutation Of The Christian Missionary Writing Ghoniem attempts to deal with my response to his paper, but as we shall see has failed to deal
Response to Hamza Abdul Malik's Debate regarding "Was Christ Crucified?" Paid Members Public
A Christian Response to Hamza Abdul Malik's Debate regarding Was Christ Crucified? Sam Shamoun This paper will briefly examine some of the most common arguments presented by Mr. Hamza Abdul Malik of the Islamic Research and Propagation Center of Jamaica, NY against the New Testament witness to the
Rebuttals to "Islamic Information" : Biblical Criticism Paid Members Public
Responses to "Islamic Information" Biblical Criticism The word "criticism" is often taken by the public to imply negative judgment. Hence "biblical criticism" is often taken to mean negative judgment against the Bible. Yet it is not necessary to gather this meaning from the use
Responses to Bismikaallahuma : Contradictory Accounts of the Creation in Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 Paid Members Public
Formulated as a rhetorical question, Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi (MENJ) concludes in a simplistic article that Contradictory Accounts of the Creation in Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 prove that the Bible cannot be from God. Much more sophisticated critics of the Bible have attacked the Bible over this issue for
Comments on Dr. Norlain Dindang Mababaya's "God: Is not the Author of Confusion" Paid Members Public
Comments on Dr. Norlain Dindang Mababaya's God: Is not the Author of Confusion This is the first article, written by Dr. Mababaya, that I have read or answered. His arguments against the Bible are, essentially, the same arguments that atheists and Jehovah's Witnesses have used in
Comments on Dr. Norlain Dindang Mababaya's "God: Is not the Author of Confusion" Paid Members Public
Response to Dr. Norlain Dindang Mababaya's God: Is not the Author of Confusion By way of a quick overview of the article, I believe Dr. Mababaya makes two main points: 1) that today's Bible is the end product of "revisions after revisions and translations after
Letter to Ahmed Deedat in response to "Combat Kit" Paid Members Public
Dear Mr. Deedat, 25 November 1993 A year ago you wrote a booklet called "Combat Kit" in which you accused the Bible of containing vulgarities. Unfortunately you have stooped very low in the way you have ridiculed the Bible. I dare say, if we tried to ridicule your