bible-study
Exegetical breakdowns, verse-by-verse analysis, and theological commentary to strengthen understanding of Scripture.
John 3:13 “… even the Son of man which is in heaven.” Paid Members Public
WILL KINNEY John 3:13 KJB (Revised Version 1881, ASV 1901) – “And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man WHICH IS IN HEAVEN.” (ὁ ὢν ἐν τῷ οὐρανῷ) ESV (NIV, NASB, NET, Holman, Jehovah Witness NWT, Catholic New
James White’s A&Ω’s Wishful Thinking about Real Exegesis Pt. 2 Paid Members Public
This is a continuation of James White’s and A & Ω’s Wishful Thinking about Real Exegesis. 1. The Scandal of the Mysterious “Albrëcht-Kappes” Translation Presumably because of Dr. White’s and TF’s lack of comfortability with Greek, about 300/1400 potential original words of their 3, 623
James White’s and A & Ω’s Wishful Thinking about Real Exegesis Paid Members Public
Jephtah’s Daughter and Mary Example Given the phenomenon of disappearing videos after faux scholarship of members of A & Ω has been exposed in the past by Albrëcht & co., TurritinFan’s (TF) article entitled: “Wishful Exegesis – Jephthah’s Daughter and Mary Example” (Thursday 10 February 2022 [7:17
BIBLE COMPARISON LISTS PT. 2 Paid Members Public
We come to the second installment of my on-going series where I contrast how various Bible translations render specific texts dealing with the Deity of Christ and/or the Holy Trinity: BIBLE COMPARISON LISTS PT. 1. In this post, I will be comparing four English versions of the Holy Bible
BIBLE COMPARISON LISTS PT. 1 Paid Members Public
In this series, I will be comparing how various Bible versions translate particular texts related to the Deity of Christ and/or the Trinity. I will be comparing three of the most conservative translations on the market done by leading and/or reputable Evangelical scholars/theologians/pastors. They are: Legacy
PROTESTANT SCHOLARSHIP ON MARY AS GOD’S ARK Paid Members Public
AN EXEGESIS OF LUKE 1:26-56 In this post, I will be citing the exegesis of Protestant expositors in regards to the language employed by Luke in recording the annunciation of, and subsequent reactions to, Jesus’ virginal conception. It has long been noted that Luke describes this miraculous event in
“The Greek ‘heos hou’ in Matthew 1:25 disproves Mary’s Perpetual Virginity”? Paid Members Public
Taken from: https://dapacemdomineonline.wordpress.com/2020/03/28/protestant-claim-the-greek-heos-hou-in-matthew-125-disproves-marys-perpetual-virginity/. The Protestant Claim Paraphrased: In Matthew 1:25, the Greek heos hou for “until” proves that Mary lost her virginity sometime after she gave birth to Jesus. Source: Who is My Mother? The Role and Status of the Mother of
SCATHING REVIEW OF BILL CRAIG’S ADAM QUEST Paid Members Public
The following is a review left on amazon.com that highlights William Lane Craig’s heretical view concerning the historical Adam and calls him out for shamelessly distorting the Holy Bible to make it agree with the theory of evolution. Paul Artale A Biblical, Logical, and Scientific Trainwreck Reviewed in