The team at Islamic Awareness has about a decade of efforts under their belt
to defend the Qur'an with reference to Egyptian history. During this time they have
written plenty of articles arguing that the Qur'an is historically accurate and
can be harmonized with the results of history and archaeology.
Scholars have tried to find the period occupied by
Moses(P)
in history and have placed him at various points within the New Kingdom,
from Tuthmosis II (c. 1493-1479 BC) to Merneptah (c. 1212-1202 BC). Most attempts have tried to locate Moses(P) in time
according to whichever king of Egypt may have played a part in the Exodus.
The Encyclopaedia
Britannica situates Moses(P) in the
reign of Seti I and Rameses II:
According to the biblical account, Moses'
parents were from the tribe of Levi, one of the groups in Egypt called Hebrews. Originally
the term Hebrew had nothing to do with race or ethnic origin. It derived from Habiru,
a variant spelling of Hapiru (Apiru), a designation of a class of people who made
their living by hiring themselves out for various services. The biblical Hebrews
had been in Egypt for generations, but apparently they became a threat, so one of
the pharaohs enslaved them. Unfortunately, the personal name of the king is not given,
and scholars have disagreed as to his identity and, hence, as to the date of the
events of the narrative of Moses. One theory takes literally the statement in I Kings 6:1 that the Exodus from Egypt occurred 480 years before Solomon began building the
Temple in Jerusalem. This occurred in the fourth year of his reign, about 960 BCE;
therefore, the Exodus would date about 1440 BCE.
This conclusion, however, is at variance with most of the biblical and archaeological
evidence. The storage cities Pithom and Rameses, built for the pharaoh by the Hebrews,
were located in the northeastern part of the Egyptian delta, not far from Goshen,
the district in which the Hebrews lived. It is implicit in the whole story that the
pharaoh's palace and capital were in the area, but Thutmose III (the pharaoh in 1440)
had his capital at Thebes, far to the south, and never conducted major building operations
in the delta region. Moreover, Edom and Moab, petty kingdoms in Transjordan that
forced Moses to circle east of them, were not yet settled and organized. Finally,
as excavations have shown, the destruction of the cities the Hebrews claimed to have
captured occurred about 1250, not 1400.
In as much as tradition figured about 12 generations from Moses to Solomon, the reference
to 480 years is most likely an editorial comment allowing 40 years for each generation.
Since an actual generation was nearer 25 years, the most probable date for the Exodus
is about 1290 BCE. If this is true, then the oppressive pharaoh noted in Exodus (Exodus 1:2-2:23)
was Seti I (reigned 1318-04), and the pharaoh during the Exodus was Ramses II (c.
1304-c. 1237). In short, Moses was probably born in the late 14th century BCE.[28]
The Academic American Encyclopaedia situates Moses(P) in the 13th century BC, with the Exodus taking place c.
1250 BC:
Moses was a leader of the ancient Hebrews
who brought them out of Egypt in the so-called Exodus (c.1250 BC), mediated the covenant
between them and Yahweh at Sinai, and guided them through the desert to the borders
of Canaan. The biblical tradition assigns him a life span of 120 years, but the reliability
of this figure is questioned.
The books of Exodus through Deuteronomy in the Bible are the only available sources
for details about Moses' life. No contemporary Egyptian documents yet found mention
him, and the later traditions about him recorded in the work of Philo of Alexandria
and in Josephus and rabbinic sources appear to be mere elaborations of the biblical
story.[29]
The generally accepted theory appears to be that
Moses(P)
lived during the reign of at least two kings, Rameses II and his successor Merneptah.
The Pharaoh Rameses II died while Moses(P) was in exile in Midian (NW Arabia):
"In the course of those many
days the king of Egypt died." (Exodus 2:23).
According to the Bible, God ordered Moses(P)
to go to Pharaoh and lead his people out of Egypt. The new king, Merneptah, refused
to allow the Hebrews to leave Egypt and finally perished in the sea whilst in pursuit
of Moses(P).
Holt's World History: A Dictionary
of Important People, Places and Events
identifies Merneptah as the Pharaoh of the Exodus:
c. 1236 - c. 1223 BC Merneptah reigned;
defeated attacks by the Libyans and Sea Peoples; records of his reign contain
the earliest mention of Israel, and many believe him to have been king
at the time of the Hebrew Exodus from Egypt.[30]
The Egyptologist Pierre Montet in his book Egypt and the Bible[31] also
concludes that Merneptah was the Pharaoh of the Exodus. The
Hutchinson New Century Encyclopaediabelieves that Merneptah was most likely the Pharaoh at that time:
Ramses was succeeded by his
13th son, the elderly Merneptah (possibly the pharaoh of the Exodus), who had
to suppress a rising in Palestine - the accounts of this revolt contain the first
mention of Israel. He also dealt successfully with invasions from the west. Then
followed 30 confused years, when several pharaohs reigned, most with doubtful claims
to the throne.[32]
Medical science has also been of assistance in helping
identify the Pharaoh of the Exodus. Between 1974-76 modern medical examinations of
the mummified bodies of Rameses II and Merneptah were carried out by a team of specialists:
In all, there were ten doctors and dentists
engaged in the primary investigations. An expanded field of study led by such experts
allowed us to make certain discoveries that cast new light on a variety of old questions
pertaining to Pharaoh Merneptah, in particular the visible lacuna[33] in his skull. Also included in our study was the mummy of Ramesses
II.
The general findings of these studies
are well known within the medical profession, and the final reports were read before
various scholarly and professional societies, of which the most important was the
French National Academy of Medicine on February 17, 1976. Also included were the
French Society of Radiology and the French Society of Forensic Medicine. The medical
profession was perfectly well informed and up-to-date concerning the work that had
been carried out in Egypt during 1974 and 1975.[34]
Whomever was the pharaoh of Egypt in the Exodus,
it is clear that he must have been in good enough health to have led the pursuing
army. The medical study of the mummy of Rameses II make it clear that Rameses II
was totally incapable of taking such a warrior-like initiative just before his death:
In order to obtain comparative data concerning
certain medical findings, we extended the research to mummies of the kings of Egypt
who reigned during other periods. The research put us in a position to bring data
concerning certain points to light, in such a way that today many hypotheses suggested
by biblical commentators before 1976 cannot be upheld. As far as the Exodus is concerned,
for example, as I will emphasize in chapter 9, Ramesses II could not have been in
a position to be at the head of the Egyptian army pursuing the Hebrews. Since he
was suffering from a disease which rendered him disabled --as shown by X-rays-- he
would not have been able to participate in the pursuit. Ramesses II could not have
played the least part in the Exodus. On the other hand, we may state without reservation
that his successor, Merenptah, was obviously injured by multiple blows resulting
in severe lesions which were rapidly or instantaneously lethal. Without excluding
death in water, emphasized by commentators of the Scriptures, the medical study has
shown that the wounds were provoked by considerable violence.[35]
For a detailed discussion concerning the periods
when Joseph(P) and Moses(P) entered Egypt and the identification of the Pharaoh of
the Exodus see: Moses
And Pharaoh: The Hebrews In Egypt[34], and Mummies
Of The Pharaohs: Modern Medical Investigations[35] by
Dr. Maurice Bucaille.
Clearly, Islamic Awareness is not only reporting what these authors are saying,
they are convinced that this is the right interpretation. They are not giving any
room to other interpretations. They have one theory which they are promoting,
and of which they are convinced that it agrees with the Qur'an, a conviction
that they share with Dr. Maurice Bucaille, one of their witnesses. Merneptah
is the Pharaoh of Exodus.
Interestingly, further research did not lead them to an expansion of their argument
with further evidence, but in the current second edition of their article (online since
3 March 2006), this section was cut down considerably:
WHEN DID MOSES
ENTER EGYPT?
The placing of Moses in ancient Egyptian history is not as contentious as that
of Abraham. Scholars have tried to find the period occupied by Moses in history
and have placed him at various points within the New Kingdom,
from Tuthmose II (c. 1493-1479 BCE) to Merenptah (c.
1212-1202 BCE). According to the Dictionary Of Proper
Names And Places In The Bible, under "Moses":
Moses career unfolds ca. 1250, the date generally
accepted for the Exodus.[39]
Similarly, the Encyclopaedia Judaica describes
Moses as a:
... leader, prophet, and lawgiver (first half of the
13th century BCE).[40]
This date is also endorsed by The Universal Jewish
Encyclopedia which says:
The period during which Moses apparently lived was the
third or fourth quarter of the 13th cent. BCE; accordingly, Ramses II or Merneptah
was the Pharaoh of the Exodus.[41]
Similar dating is also endorsed by The Lion Handbook
To The Bible,[42]New
Bible Dictionary,[43]The
Eerdmans Bible Dictionary,[44]Harper's
Bible Dictionary,[45]Encyclopedia
Of The Bible,[46]The
Interpreter's Dictionary Of The Bible[47]
and The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia.[48]
Scholars such as Pierre Montet,[49] Kenneth
Kitchen[50] and J. K. Hoffmeier[51]
also place Moses in the New Kingdom Period.
What is the main change? Islamic Awareness still sticks to a rough dating
of the event, but they no longer identify the Pharaoh of Exodus. They are no longer
claiming that it is definitely Merneptah. The most important statement that disappeared
is this one:
The generally accepted theory appears to be that
Moses(P)
lived during the reign of at least two kings, Rameses II and his successor Merneptah.
The Pharaoh Rameses II died while Moses(P) was in exile in Midian (NW Arabia) ...
And then this one:
For a detailed discussion concerning the periods
when Joseph(P) and Moses(P) entered Egypt and the identification of the Pharaoh of
the Exodus see: Moses
And Pharaoh: The Hebrews In Egypt[34], and Mummies
Of The Pharaohs: Modern Medical Investigations[35] by Dr. Maurice Bucaille.
In other words, Islamic Awareness originally not only agreed that the life of Moses
spanned the reigns of several Pharaohs, they even positively identified which Pharaohs
those were. Today, they are no longer arguing that Merneptah was the Pharaoh of the Exodus,
despite the fact that Dr. Bucaille's books and theories have been very popular among
Muslims for nearly three decades. But they are not offering a genuine alternative either.
In fact, the name of Maurice Bucaille disappeared completely from their discussion of
the Pharaoh of Moses.
What could be the reason for their retreat from their original position?
My guess is this: The Islamic Awareness team realized that the Qur'an
actually teaches that there was only one Pharaoh from the birth of Moses to the Exodus,
thus obliterating their earlier theory. Maybe they came across the article,
Who
was the Pharaoh of the Exodus?, written by Asim Mehmood? Maybe they found the
evidence for this in some of the classical Qur'an commentaries? They have not informed
their readership of the reasons for their change, but this change is rather substantial.
The data of the Qur'an regarding the Pharaoh are examined in detail in the article,
A Pharaoh Who Forgot to Die in Time?,
which exposes a number of problems in the Quranic version(s) of this story.
Whatever the source and reason, the Islamic Awareness team has apparently
seen this problem, or even more problems, and thus they "corrected" their article
in a way that would not alert the readers and would hopefully not raise any doubts
about the Qur'an.
In other words, they realized that the Qur'an does actually not agree
with "the generally accepted theory" (their earlier words) and so they no longer
like to call it "the generally accepted theory".
The main thrust of their article is that the Bible uses the title "Pharaoh"
anachronisticly, but the Qur'an uses it correctly, i.e. uses it only for
the Pharaoh of Moses, but not the king of Egypt at the time of Joseph. Assuming
that the Qur'an is correct on this detail, they suggest that divine revelation
could be the only reason for this amazing accuracy.
However, given the many details regarding Egypt about which the Qur'an is clearly wrong
(cf. the list of articles at the top of this
article), that seems to be a premature conclusion. Had the Qur'an been correct on all
historical details, and if it had provided details that go way beyond what is found in
the Bible, this could have been considered impressive. In the present case, the Qur'an
seems to be correct by accident rather than supernatural revelation.
The Holy Bible sternly warned Israel not to intermarry with the pagan nations lest they end up worshiping their gods/goddesses:
“Be sure to keep what I am commanding you this day: behold, I am going to drive out the Amorite before you, and the Canaanite, the Hittite, the Perizzite,
In this post I will show that the true God loves all nations equally, not just Israel. I will demonstrate that God commanded the Israelites to love the foreigner or non-Israelite as a fellow, native-born Israelite, and ordered that the same Law and commands equally apply to both Israelite and