Responding to Muhammadan Abdullah Kunde Pt. 2 Paid Members Public
This is a continuation from the previous post: Responding to Muhammadan Abdullah Kunde Pt. 1. As I noted in a previous post, Abdullah Kunde is making the classic Muslim Debater’s Blunder. He’s tossing criticisms at Christianity without considering whether those criticisms would also apply to Islam. Sam Shamoun
Responding to Muhammadan Abdullah Kunde Pt. 1 Paid Members Public
I am posting my responses to Muslim polemicist Abdullah Kunde, which originally appeared on David Wood’s blog. Australian debater Abdullah Kunde is apparently making the same mistake virtually every Muslim debater makes: he’s so focused on raising criticisms against Christianity, he fails to see how those same criticisms
Responding to Muhammadan Abdullah Kunde Pt. 3 Paid Members Public
This is the final part in the series: Responding to Muhammadan Abdullah Kunde Pt. 2. I really wish that all Muslim debaters would spend a few semesters at the Sam Shamoun School of Religious Consistency. It would keep them from constantly attacking their own religion (without knowing it). Here’s
Adam: A Forgetful Victim or A Rebellious Transgressor? Paid Members Public
One will often find Muslim polemicists denying that Adam’s sin negatively affected the human race by causing mankind to inherit a corrupt sinful inclination/nature which makes it inevitable that humans will indeed disobey and transgress God’s laws. They further claim that Adam’s “mistake” wasn’t a
Muhammad Confirms that Jesus is the unique Divine Son of God! Paid Members Public
Muhammad, according to the Quran, came to confirm the textual veracity and inspiration of the biblical books in the possession of the Jews and Christians of his day, and testify to his belief in these sacred writings: And believe in that which I reveal, confirming that which ye possess already
Monogenes Theos: A Gnostic Corruption? Paid Members Public
I am reposting New Testament textual scholar James E. Snpp Jr’s post where he shows that the reading moongenes theos (“only-begotten God”), being the read that many English versions adopt, may have been a heretical gnostic corruption that crept its way into the New Testament textual transmission. JOHN 1:
Edward F. Hills on 1 John 5:7 Paid Members Public
The late Edward F. Hills was a reputable conservative Evangelical Christian textual scholar who wrote a book defending the superiority of the King James Version. The following is an excerpt from that book where Hills makes a case for the authenticity of 1 John 5:7, commonly referred to as
Revisiting the Worship of the God-Man Paid Members Public
In this post I am going to revisit the issue of the honors given to Christ, documenting that Jesus receives the very worship which only God is supposed to receive. Pelach In the Aramaic section of the book of Daniel, pelach is the type of service that is to be