“Let us make man” and the Cohortative Mood Paid Members Public
Another Muslim Attempt at Denying The Trinitarian Implications of Genesis 1:26 Sam Shamoun There is a rather strong passage in Genesis 1 to God being multi-personal as opposed to uni-personal. It comes from the description of man’s creation in the image of God: “Then God said, ‘Let US
Revisiting the Issue of Jesus Forgiving Sins Paid Members Public
Sam Shamoun Christophobe and taqiyyist extraordinaire Paul Bilal Williams has posted a link to a video by a so-called Christian unitarian who attempts to explain away the Gospels’ explicit testimony to Jesus’ intrinsic authority to forgive sins. Williams writes: Who can forgive sins but God alone? An interesting take on
A Leading Muslim Taqiyyist Strikes Back! Paid Members Public
Sam Shamoun This will be a very short reply to Muslim taqiyyist Sami Zaatari who has come out with a “response” where he shamefully twists my words in order to mislead his readers and thinks he can actually get away with it! He quotes a part of my reply to
Answering A Fool According To His Folly Paid Members Public
Taking Another Look At The Quran’s Contradictory Creation Accounts Sam Shamoun Readers’ Discretion Advised The Holy Bible says that there is a time and place in which to ignore a fool: “Do not answer a fool according to his folly, Or you will also be like him.” Proverbs 26:
Revisiting the Issue of the Quran and the Falsification Test Paid Members Public
Sam Shamoun This is a brief reply to another one of Bassam Zawadi’s attempts of defending the indefensible. Zawadi tries to take a stab at refuting my article which details how the Quran fails a Muslim falsification test. Zawadi writes: First of all, there is a big difference between
Addressing Paul Williams’ False Accusations Pt. 6 Paid Members Public
Sam Shamoun We now come to the final part of our rebuttal. Williams attempts to defend Muhammad’s teaching that Allah will torture Jews and Christians as a sacrifice for the sins committed by Muslims. In order for the readers to follow along we will again quote one of the
Addressing Paul Williams’ False Accusations Pt. 5 Paid Members Public
Sam Shamoun We continue our discussion. What Williams does next is absolutely astounding. He tries to call into question the Eucharistic passages found in the Gospels by claiming that Paul may have influenced them! He writes: 1) Let us look at the earliest account we have in Paul’s first
Addressing Paul Williams’ False Accusations Pt. 4 Paid Members Public
Sam Shamoun We continue our reply to Williams’ assertions. Williams claims that Matthew was embarrassed by the way Mark narrated the story of the young man Jesus, and so decided to change some of the dialogue between them. Hence, instead of the rich man calling Jesus “Good master,” Matthew has