2020

Continuing from my previous post: Islam: The Religion of Perfect Submission to Muhammad. I will now show that Muhammad was far from being a case of supreme moral virtue for others to imitate. Rather, he was an example of moral and sexual deviant who needs to be shunned and condemned.

In a previous post, Sunni Islam’s Shahadah: The Confession of Lying Hypocrites, I showed that the Islamic scripture proclaims that a Muslim is one that bears witness to Allah being the only god and makes an effort to completely submit to his will. As the following verse puts it:

Unless stated otherwise, I will be quoting from the Quran: A Reformist Translation (QART), translated and annotated by Edip Yuksel, Layth Saleh al-Shaiban, Martha Schulte-Nafeh (Brainbowpress: Hundred Fourteen Books, USA 2015). Traditional Sunni Islam teaches that the first pillar of the Muslim faith is the kalima, also known as the

This is a continuation from the previous post: Responding to Muhammadan Abdullah Kunde Pt. 1. As I noted in a previous post, Abdullah Kunde is making the classic Muslim Debater’s Blunder. He’s tossing criticisms at Christianity without considering whether those criticisms would also apply to Islam. Sam Shamoun

I am posting my responses to Muslim polemicist Abdullah Kunde, which originally appeared on David Wood’s blog. Australian debater Abdullah Kunde is apparently making the same mistake virtually every Muslim debater makes: he’s so focused on raising criticisms against Christianity, he fails to see how those same criticisms

This is the final part in the series: Responding to Muhammadan Abdullah Kunde Pt. 2. I really wish that all Muslim debaters would spend a few semesters at the Sam Shamoun School of Religious Consistency. It would keep them from constantly attacking their own religion (without knowing it). Here’s

One will often find Muslim polemicists denying that Adam’s sin negatively affected the human race by causing mankind to inherit a corrupt sinful inclination/nature which makes it inevitable that humans will indeed disobey and transgress God’s laws. They further claim that Adam’s “mistake” wasn’t a

Muhammad, according to the Quran, came to confirm the textual veracity and inspiration of the biblical books in the possession of the Jews and Christians of his day, and testify to his belief in these sacred writings:   And believe in that which I reveal, confirming that which ye possess already

I am reposting New Testament textual scholar James E. Snpp Jr’s post where he shows that the reading moongenes theos (“only-begotten God”), being the read that many English versions adopt, may have been a heretical gnostic corruption that crept its way into the New Testament textual transmission. JOHN 1:

The late Edward F. Hills was a reputable conservative Evangelical Christian textual scholar who wrote a book defending the superiority of the King James Version. The following is an excerpt from that book where Hills makes a case for the authenticity of 1 John 5:7, commonly referred to as